Q: Can I vote by telephone or electronically?
If
you are a registered shareholder (that is, if you hold your shares in
certificate form), your own name,you may
onlysubmit a proxy by telephone or by mail. | · | Submitting a Proxy by Telephone: You can submit a proxy for your shares by telephone until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 16, 2013 by calling the toll-free telephone number on the enclosed proxy card, (800) 690-6903. Telephone proxy submission is available 24 hours a day. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to submit a proxy for your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Our telephone proxy submission procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders by using individual control numbers. |
| · | Submitting a Proxy by Mail: If you choose to submit a proxy by mail, simply mark the appropriate proxy card, date and sign it, and return it in the postage paid envelope provided or to the address shown on the proxy card. |
By casting your vote in person or by written proxy.
any of the ways listed above, you are authorizing the individuals listed on the proxy to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.If your shares are held in “streetthe name” of a bank, broker or other nominee, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must follow for your shares to be voted. The availability of telephonic or Internet voting will depend on the bank’s or broker’s voting process. Please check with your bank or broker and follow the voting procedures your bank or broker provides to vote your shares. Also, please checknote that if the holder of record of your shares is a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must request a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares and present that proxy and proof of identification at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a participant in the First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”), you will receive a voting instruction card to use to provide voting instructions to First Financial Bank, N.A. (the trustee of the ESOP), for the shares allocated to your account under the ESOP. Your voting instruction to the trustee should be completed, dated, signed and returned in the envelope provided byApril 8, 2013. Please do not returnyour voting instructions to the Corporation. Your voting instructions will be kept confidential by the ESOP trustee and will not be disclosed to any of our directors, officers or contactemployees. In order to maintain confidentiality, your voting instruction will be received by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., who will tabulate the voting instruction results and provide them to the ESOP trustee on an aggregate basis. Unless the terms of the ESOP or the fiduciary duties of the ESOP trustee require otherwise, the ESOP trustee will vote your ESOP shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not return your voting instruction card in a timely manner or if you return the voting instruction card unsigned or without indicating how you desire to vote the shares allocated to your ESOP account, the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee will direct the ESOP trustee to vote the shares allocated to your account in the same proportion and in the same manner as the shares with respect to which timely and proper instructions by participants were received. The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee consists of Anton H. George, Ronald K. Rich, and William J. Voges. The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors and may be changed by the Board at any time.
| Q: | If I am the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker automatically vote my shares for me? |
Stock exchange rules applicable to brokers grant your broker or nominee to determine whether you will be ablediscretionary authority to vote your shares without receiving your instructions on certain matters. Your broker has discretionary voting authority under these rules to vote your shares on the ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, unless you provide voting instructions to your broker, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors or approval of the compensation of our executive officers. Therefore, it is particularly important that beneficial owners instruct their brokers how they wish to vote their shares.
| Q: | What is an “abstention” or a broker “non-vote” and how do they affect the vote? |
An “abstention” occurs when a shareholder sends in a proxy with explicit instructions to decline to vote regarding a particular matter. Abstentions are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. An abstention with respect to the election of directors is neither a vote cast “for” a nominee or a vote cast “against” the nominee and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Abstentions with respect to the ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm or approval of the compensation of or executive officers will also have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
A broker “non-vote” occurs when a broker or other nominee who holds shares for the beneficial owner is unable to vote those shares for the beneficial owner because the broker or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power for the proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Brokers will have discretionary voting power to vote shares for which no voting instructions have been provided by telephonethe beneficial owner only with respect to the ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Brokers will not have such discretionary voting power to vote shares with respect to the election of directors or electronically throughapproval of the Internet.
compensation of our executive officers. Shares that are the subject of a broker non-vote are included for quorum purposes, but a broker non-vote with respect to a proposal will not be counted as a vote represented at the meeting and entitled to vote and, consequently, as a general matter, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.Q: Can I change my vote after I return my proxy card?
Yes. Even after you have submittedYou may revoke your proxy you mayor change your votevoting instructions at any time beforeprior to the proxy is exercised by filing withvote at the annual meeting by:
| · | providing written notice to the Secretary of the Corporation; |
| · | delivering a valid, later-dated proxy; or |
| · | attending the annual meeting and voting in person. |
Please note that your attendance at the Corporation, Rodger A. McHargue, First Financial Corporation, One First Financial Plaza, P.O. Box 540, Terre Haute, Indiana 47808, either a notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. The powers of the proxy holders will be suspended if you attend theannual meeting in person and so request, although attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke acause your previously granted proxy.
Q: What are the Board’s recommendations?
Unlessproxy to be revoked unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors (or “Board”). The Board’s recommendations are set forth together with the description of each proposal in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board recommends a vote “FOR” election of the nominated slate of directors.
With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their best judgment.
specifically so request.Q: What vote is required to approve each item?
proposal?Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting.Consequently, the director nominees receiving the most votes of the holders of our common stock will be elected as directors. Only votes cast FORa nominee will be counted.A properly executed proxy marked “WITHHOLD AUTHORITY” with respect to the election of one or more directors will not be voted with respect to the director or directors indicated, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether therea quorum is a quorum.
present.The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote will be requiredproposals for the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath and Company LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Action on any other matters to come beforefirm for the meeting mustfiscal year ending December 31, 2013, and approval of the compensation of our named executive officers will be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority ofif the shares present, in person, or by proxy.
If you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, your broker or nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with respect to some ofvotes cast for the matters to be acted upon. Thus, if you do not give your broker or nominee specific instructions, your shares may not be voted onproposal exceed those matters andcast against the proposal. Abstentions will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessaryas votes cast either for approval. However, shares represented by such “broker non-votes” will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.
Q: What if other matters come up during the meeting?
If any matters other than those referred to in the notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders properly come before the meeting, the individuals named in the accompanying form of proxy will vote the proxies held by them as recommended by the Board of Directors or if no recommendation is given, in accordance with their best judgment. The Corporation is not aware of any business other than the items referred to in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders that may be considered at the meeting.
If for any reason any of the director/nominees becomes unable or is unwilling to serve at the time of the meeting (an event which the Board of Directors does not anticipate), the persons named as proxies in the accompanying form of proxy will have discretionary authority to vote for a substitute nominee or nominees named by the Governance/Nominating Committee if the Board of Directors elects to fill such nominees’ position. If any shareholder proposal intended to be presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting was not received by the Corporation on or before February 10, 2010, the proxies will have discretionary authority to vote on the matter.
against these proposals.
3
Q: Who pays to prepare, mail, and solicit the proxies?
The Corporation pays all costs of preparing, mailing and soliciting proxies. The Corporation asks brokers, banks, voting trustees and other nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners and to obtain authority to execute proxies. The Corporation will reimburse the brokers, banks, voting trustees and other nominees and fiduciaries upon request. In addition, proxies may be solicited by mail, in person or by telephone by certain of the Corporation’s officers, directors and employees who will not be separately compensated for such activity.
Q: Whom should I call with other questions?
If you have additional questions about this proxy statementProxy Statement or the annual meeting or would like additional copies of this document or our 20092012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, please contact: Rodger A. McHargue, Secretary, First Financial Corporation, One First Financial Plaza, P.O. Box 540, Terre Haute, Indiana 47808, (812) 238-6000.
4
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors is currently composed of eleven (11) members. The Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation divide the Board of Directors into three classes, as nearly equal in size as possible, with one classboard of directors elected each year for a term extending to the third succeeding Annual Meeting after such election. The nominees for election as director are nominated to serve for terms to expire as of the 2013 Annual Meeting. Eachannual meeting of shareholders will consist of ten members, divided into three classes of approximately equal size that are elected for staggered three-year terms.The board believes this structure helps to maintain continuity and stability and ensures we have directors serving on the board who have substantial knowledge of the Corporation, all of which the board believes facilitates long-term value for our shareholders.
Three directors are to be elected. W. Curtis Brighton, William R. Krieble, and Ronald K. Richhave each been nominated for a term of three years and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. They are all members of the present board of directors. If, at the time of this annual meeting, any nominee is unable or declines to serve, the discretionary authority provided in the proxy may be exercised to vote for a current directorsubstitute or substitutes. The board of the Corporation. The following information is provided concerning eachdirectors has no reason to believe that any substitute nominee or nominees will be required.
Name, Age, Principal Occupation(s) and each incumbent director continuing in office.
Names and Ages of Nominees for Terms to Expire in 2013 Business Experience
| | Nominated for a term expiring in 2016: |
W. Curtis Brighton,Age 56 | | Director since 200459 |
PresidentMr. Brighton joined the Board in 2004 and is a current member of the Corporation’s Enterprise Risk Management, Loan Review, and Loan Policy and Procedures Committees as well as the Bank’s Loan Committee. Mr. Brighton is the president of Templeton Coal Company, Inc. Prior to this, Mr. Brighton held the positions of president and general counsel for Hulman and Company. Mr. Brighton has been the general manager of Lynch Coal Operators Reciprocal Association since 1985 and was a private practice attorney for 12 years. He serves on the boards of Templeton Coal Company, | | Inc., Deep Vein Coal Company, Inc., Princeton Mining Company, Inc., R.J. Oil Company, Inc., Union Hospital, Inc. and Lynch Coal Operators Reciprocal Association. Mr. Brighton earned a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Indiana State University and a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from Drake University. |
| | |
William R. Krieble,Age 62 | | Director Since 200965 |
Program Director forMr.Krieble joined the Board in 2009 and serves on the Bank’s Loan and Community Reinvestment Act Committees. Mr. Krieble also serves on the Corporation’s Enterprise Risk Management and Affirmative Action Committees. Mr. Krieble retired after 41 years of service to the State of Indiana Bureauwhere he most recently served as the program director for the Division of Developmental DisabilitiesDisability and Rehabilitative Services — Initiatives | | of the State of Indiana. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Indiana State University. |
| | |
| | Director since 200574 |
Financial RepresentativeMr. Rich joined the Board in 2005 and serves as the Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee. He is a member of the Corporation’s Compensation and Employee Benefits, Enterprise Risk Management and Audit Committees. Mr. Rich also is a member of the Bank’s Loan Committee. Mr. Rich also serves as the Lead Independent Director. Mr. Rich has been a financial representative for Northwestern Mutual Financial Network since 1963. He holds CLU and CHFC designations from American College. |
| Directors whose terms expire in 2015: |
| | |
Donald E. Smith, Age 83
| | Director since 1983* |
Chairman of the Board and President of the Corporation | | |
Names and Ages of Incumbent Members of the Board of Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2011
| | |
B. Guille Cox, Jr., Age 64
| | Director since 1983* |
Attorney with Cox Zwerner Gambill & Sullivan | | |
| | |
Anton H. George, Age 50
| | Director since 1989 |
Past President of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway and Hulman and Company | | |
| | |
Gregory L. Gibson, Age 47
| | Director since 1994 |
President of ReTec, Inc. | | |
| | |
Virginia L. Smith, Age 61
| | Director since 1987 |
President of Princeton Mining Company, Inc. | | |
Names and Ages of Incumbent Members of the Board of Directors Whose Terms to Expire in 2012
| | |
| | Director since 198962 |
PresidentMr. Dinkel joined the Board in 1989 and serves on the Corporation’s Audit and Loan Review Committees. He also serves on the Bank’s Community Reinvestment Act, Investment Services and Loan Committees. Mr. Dinkel has been the president and chief executive officer of Sycamore Engineering, Inc. | | Inc, Dinkel Associates, Sycamore Building Corporation and Dinkel Telekom since 1986 and has held various positions at Sycamore Engineering since 1966. Mr. Dinkel serves on the board of Rose Hulman Institute of Technology and is chairman of the business administration and compensation committees. Additionally, he serves on the facilities, investment management, president evaluation, executive and student affairs committees of the board of Rose Hulman. He earned his B.S. degree from Rose Hulman Institute of Technology. |
| | |
| | Director since 198966 |
Mr. Lowery joined the Board in 1989. He serves on the Corporation’s Acquisition, Affirmative Action, Disaster Recovery, Disclosure, Executive, Enterprise Risk Management, Loan Policy and Procedures, Loan Review and Strategic Planning Committees. Mr. Lowery also serves on the Bank’s Asset Liability and Community Reinvestment Act Committees. Mr. Lowery is the Vice Chairman of the Board,and Chief Executive Officer of theFirst Financial Corporation, serving since 1996 and 2004 respectively. He is also the President and Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Bank, N.A. | | serving since 1996. Prior to joining First Financial Corporation, Mr. Lowery was a partner in the law firm of Wright, Shagley and Lowery where he practiced for 19 years. Mr. Lowery is a member of the boards of Lynch Coal Operators Reciprocal Association, Indiana State University, the Regional Board of Ivy Tech Community College, the Terre Haute Economic Development Corp. and the Terre Haute Chamber of Commerce. He received a B.S. degree in Political Science from Indiana State University and a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from Indiana University. |
| | |
| | Director since 200858 |
PresidentMr. Voges joined the Board in 2008 and serves on the Corporation’s Compensation and Employee Benefits, Governance and Nominating Committees as well as the Bank’s Loan Committee. Mr. Voges has served as chief executive officer and chairman of Thethe Root Co. | | Company since 1996 and as general counsel since 1990. Prior to joining the Root Company, he was a partner in the Fink, Loucks, Sweet, and Voges law firm for 9 years. Mr. Voges also served on the board for Consolidated-Tomoka Land Company (a public company listed on the NYSE-AMEX under the symbol CTO) from 2001 to 2012, where he has served as Chairman from 2009 to 2011, and on the audit, executive and corporate governance committees. He also has prior experience on the boards of several financial institutions. Mr. Voges received his B.S. in Business Administration from Stetson University and his Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from Stetson College of Law. |
| | Directors whose terms expire in 2014: |
*B. Guille Cox, Jr., Age 67 |
| Mr. Cox has served on the Board of First Financial Corporation was formedsince 1987 and is the Chairman of the Bank’s Trust Committee. He also serves on the Bank’s Investment and Loan Committees as well as the Corporation’s Governance and Nominating Committees. Mr. Cox has been a Senior Partner in 1983.the Law Firm Cox, Zwerner, Gambill & Sullivan since 1980. He also serves on the boards of Hendrich Title Company and Katzenbach Inc. As a Rose Hulman Institute of Technology board member, Mr. Cox serves on the executive and investment committees. Mr. Cox received a B.S. degree in Physics from MIT and a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from Harvard Law School. |
Anton H. George, Age 53 |
Mr. George joined the Board in 1987 and is Chairman of the Corporation’s Audit and Compensation and Employee Benefits Committees. He also serves on the Bank’s Loan Committee. Mr. George is the president of Vision Investments, LLC and Vision Enterprises Global, LLC. Mr. George is the past president and chief executive officer of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway and Hulman and Company. He also is a current director of Vectren Corporation. Mr. George earned a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Indiana State University. |
5
Gregory L. Gibson, Age 50 |
Mr. Gibson joined the Board in 1994 and serves on the Corporation’s Loan Review Committee as well as the Bank’s Loan Committee. Mr. Gibson is the president of ReTec, Inc. and serves on the boards of Rose Hulman Institute of Technology and Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College. Mr. Gibson has also served on the Indiana Judicial Commission and is currently serving on the Indiana Port Commission as well as the board of directors for the Methodist Health Foundation in Indianapolis. He holds a B.S. degree from Rose Hulman Institute of Technology. |
Virginia L. Smith, Age 65 |
Ms. Smith joined the Board in 1987 and serves on the Corporation’s Loan Review, Loan Policy and Procedures, Affirmative Action, and Executive Committees as well as the Bank’s Loan Committee. Ms. Smith has been the president of Princeton Mining Company, Inc. since 1990. She also serves on the boards of Deep Vein Coal Company Inc., Princeton Mining Company Inc., R.J. Oil Company Inc. and the Sheldon Swope Art Museum. Ms. Smith received a B.S. degree in Education from Indiana State University and a B.S. in Business Administration from Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College. |
Recommendation of the Board of DirectorsOur board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” W. Curtis Brighton, William R. Krieble, and Ronald K. Rich, the persons nominated by the Governance and Nominating Committee to be elected as directors.
The Governance and Nominating Committee believes that well functioning boards consist of a diverse collection of individuals that bring a variety of complementary skills. Although the board of directors does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying directors, diversity is one of the factors that the Governance and Nominating Committee may, pursuant to its charter, take into account in identifying director candidates. The Governance and Nominating Committee generally considers each director eligible for nomination in the broad context of the overall composition of our board of directors with a view toward constituting a board that, as a body, possesses the demonstrated senior leadership and management experience to oversee our business. The Committee has historically sought directors that bring broad and varied skills and knowledge from retail and wholesale businesses, legal, financial and government.The experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led the Governance and Nominating Committee to conclude that each of the members of the board of directors nominated by the Governance and Nominating Committee should serve on the board are generally described below:
W. Curtis Brighton
Mr. Brighton’s history as a private practice attorney provides the Board with an enhanced legal and regulatory perspective.
B. Guille Cox, Jr.
Having served on the Board of the Corporation since 1987, Mr. Cox provides a historical perspective of both the Corporation and the industry for our Board. His legal practice provides the Board with counsel on legal issues as well as issues in our markets.
Thomas Dinkel
As a business owner and an entrepreneur, Mr. Dinkel provides an understanding of small business which makes up much of our lending base. His vast experience as a contractor also provides us with key insight in our expansion efforts.
Anton H. George
Mr. George’s experience on various boards of directors provides valuable advice on governance issues. As an established Midwest entrepreneur, Mr. George has significant knowledge of the markets in which we operate.
Gregory L. Gibson
As a businessman and entrepreneur, Mr. Gibson has a variety of business interests. This provides the Board with invaluable knowledge into these segments of our clients and the markets. As a developer, Mr. Gibson provides counsel for market expansion. His service on Boards also provides valuable political and governance perspectives.
William R. Krieble
Mr. Krieble’s long service to the State of Indiana provides the Board with valuable political and governmental perspectives.
Norman L. Lowery
As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lowery is intimately familiar with First Financial Corporation, its customers and its employees and provides the Board with valuable leadership, particularly through his keen insight into the industry and the markets we serve. His legal background also provides a critical element with respect to governance and regulatory issues affecting the Corporation and the Bank. Mr. Lowery also provides valuable counsel to the Board with respect to our strategic initiatives.
Ronald K. Rich
Mr. Rich’s long service in the financial and insurance industries brings specific knowledge of matters affecting the Corporation’s insurance subsidiary and its insurance matters. Mr. Rich also possesses valuable insight regarding our markets and our various client bases.
Virginia L. Smith
Ms. Smith’s service as president of a local retail company provides the Board with valuable insight regarding our market area. Also, as a female business leader, she provides important perspectives on women-owned businesses.
William J. Voges
Mr. Voges’ past service on the boards of financial institutions provides additional perspectives of the issues facing our Board. His legal background, coupled with his past experience, provides tremendous value on legal, governance and regulatory matters. Mr. Voges also complements the Board with his keen strategic insight.
BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS
ADDITIONAL information about the Board of directorsMeetings and Attendance
During the year ended December 31, 2009,2012, the Board of Directors of the Corporation met 1819 times. Each Directordirector attended more than 75% of the aggregate of (i) all meetings of the Board held while he or she was a director and (ii) all meetings of committees on which he or she served during the period that he or she served on the committee. Although the Corporation has no formal policy on director attendance at annual meetings of shareholders, they are encouraged to attend such meetings. All directors attended the 20092012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Committees
The Board of Directors has established a number of committees which facilitate the administration and oversight of the Corporation. Among these committees are the Governance and Nominating, Audit and Compensation and Employee Benefits Committees.
Governance / Nominating Committees.
Governance/and Nominating Committee. Members consist of
Messrs.B. Guille Cox,
Jr., Ronald K. Rich
(Chairman) and
William J. Voges. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Cox, Rich and Voges are independent under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The
Governance/Governance and Nominating Committee met three times during 2012.The primary objectives of the Governance and Nominating Committee are to assist the Board of Directors by developing and recommending corporate governance policies and guidelines for the Corporation and by identifying and nominating persons for election to the Board of Directors and appointment to the committees of the Board. A copy of the Governance and Nominating Committee Charter is available on the Corporation’s web site atwww.first-online.com on the “Investor Relations” page under the link “Governance Documents.”
The Governance and Nominating Committee identifies director nominees through a combination of referrals, including referrals from management, existing boardBoard members and shareholders. The Governance/Other than the director qualifications and independence standards established in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance and Nominating Committee currently does not maintain any formal criteria for selecting directors and may take into consideration such factors and criteria as it deems appropriate. However, in reviewing qualifications for prospective nominees to the Board, the Governance/Governance and Nominating Committee maygenerally will take into consideration, among other matters, the prospective nominee’sa candidate’s experiences, skills, expertise, diversity, personal and professional integrity, character, business experience, educational experience or equivalent background, stature, judgment, conflicts of interest, integrity, ethics, commitment, reputation, time available to serve, community involvement, civic-mindedness,dedication, conflicts of interest and ability to oversee the Corporation’s business and affairs. The Governance/Governance and Nominating Committee does not evaluate nominees proposed by shareholders any differently than other nominees to the Board.
This Committee met three times during 2009. A copy of the charter of this Committee is available on the Corporation’s web site at www.first-online.com.
Audit Committee. Members consist of Messrs.Anton H. George (Chairman), Thomas T. Dinkel and Ronald K. Rich. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. George, Dinkel and Rich are independent under SEC Rule 10A-3 of the SEC and the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The Audit Committee met 4 times during 2012.
The primary objectives of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of the following matters:
| · | The integrity of our financial statements. |
| · | The qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. |
��
| · | The performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accountants. |
| · | Our compliance with certain applicable legal and regulatory requirements. |
| · | Our system of disclosure controls and system of internal controls regarding finance, accounting and legal compliance. |
In addition, among other responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviews the Corporation’s operations and management, accounting functions, the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal controls and internal auditing methods and procedures. The Committee is also responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm for the Corporation. The Audit Committee had four meetings during 2009. A copy of the Audit Committee charter of this Committee is available on the Corporation’s website at www.first-online.com.
www.first-online.com on the “Investor Relations” page under the link “Governance Documents.”The Board of Directors has determined that a currenteach member of the Audit Committee is financially sophisticated under the applicable NASDAQ rules. The Board of Directors selected the members of the Audit Committee based on the Board’s determination that they are fully qualified to monitor the performance of management, the public disclosures by the Corporation of its financial condition and performance, our internal accounting operations and our independent auditors.registered public accountants. In addition, the Audit Committee has the ability on its own to retain independent accountants or other consultantsadvisors whenever it deems appropriate.
The Board of Directors has determined that the Corporation currently does not have a director who qualifies as a “financial expert” under federal securities laws. To be considered a “financial expert,” an individual’s past experience generally must include experience in the preparation or audit of comparable public company financial statements, or the supervision of someone in the preparation or audit of comparable public company financial statements. While it might be possible to recruit a person who meets these qualifications of a “financial expert,” the Board has determined that in order to fulfill all the functions of our Board and our Audit Committee, each member of our Board and our Audit Committee, including any “financial expert,” should ideally understand community banking and understand the markets in which the Corporation operates, and that it is not in the best interests of our Corporation to nominate as a director someone who does not have all the experience, attributes and qualifications we seek.
6
Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee. Members.Members consist of
Messrs.Anton H. George
(Chairman), Ronald K. Rich and
William J. Voges. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. George, Rich and Voges are independent under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The Compensation
and Employee Benefits Committee
approvesmet 3 times in 2012.The primary objective of the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee is to approve the compensation of theour named executive officers. This committee alsoofficers and senior management. In addition, among other responsibilities, the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee administers the compensation plans of the Corporation. The Compensation Committee met three times in 2009. A copy of the charter of thisthe Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee is available on the Corporation’s website at www.first-online.com.
www.first-online.com on the “Investor Relations” page under the link “Governance Documents.”Compensation of Directors
The goal of theour director compensation package is to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board of Directors. In setting compensation, the Board considers compensation levels of directors of other financial institutions of similar size. In addition, directors are compensated under the 2001 and 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is directly linked to Corporation performance (as described below). Each director of the Corporation is also a director of First Financial Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), the lead subsidiary bank of the Corporation, and receives directors’Corporation. The non-employee directors receive director fees from each ofboth the Corporation and the Bank. During 20092012, nonemployee directors received a $40,000.00 retainer from the Corporation and a $5,000.00 retainer from the Bank. During 2012, each non-employee director of the Corporation and the Bank received a fee of $750 for each board meeting attended. No changes were made to director compensation arrangements in 2009 compared to 2008.
attended for the Corporation and the Bank, respectively.Non-employee directors also receive a fee for each meeting attended of the Audit Committee of $1,000, the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of $1,000, the Governance/Governance and Nominating Committee of $500 and the Loan Committee of $300. Each director also received from the Bank a semi-annual director’s fee of $2,500 on July 15th and December 16th.$300. No non-employee director served as a director of any other subsidiary of the Corporation.
Director Compensation Table
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Corporation to each non-employee Directordirector for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Change in Pension Value and | | | | | | | |
| | | Fees Earned or Paid | | | Nonequity Incentive | | | Nonqualified Deferred | | | All Other | | | | |
| | | in Cash | | | Plan Compensation | | | Compensation Earnings | | | Compensation | | | Total | |
| Name | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | |
| (a)(1) | | (b)(2)(3) | | | (c)(4) | | | (d) | | | (e)(5) | | | (f) | |
| W. Curtis Brighton | | $ | 35,800 | | | $ | 51,200 | | | | N/A | | | | -0- | | | $ | 87,000 | |
| B. Guille Cox, Jr. | | $ | 37,100 | | | $ | 51,200 | | | | N/A | | | $ | 9,263 | | | $ | 97,563 | |
| Thomas T. Dinkel | | $ | 39,800 | | | $ | 51,200 | | | | N/A | | | | -0- | | | $ | 91,000 | |
| Anton H. George | | $ | 40,700 | | | $ | 51,200 | | | | N/A | | | | -0- | | | $ | 91,900 | |
| Gregory L. Gibson | | $ | 36,000 | | | $ | 51,200 | | | | N/A | | | $ | 12,834 | | | $ | 100,034 | |
| William R. Krieble | | $ | 25,900 | | | $ | -0- | | | | N/A | | | | -0- | | | $ | 25,900 | |
| Ronald K. Rich | | $ | 44,000 | | | $ | 51,200 | | | | N/A | | | | -0- | | | $ | 95,200 | |
| Virginia L. Smith | | $ | 34,900 | | | $ | 51,200 | | | | N/A | | | | -0- | | | $ | 86,100 | |
| William J. Voges | | $ | 37,300 | | | $ | 51,200 | | | | N/A | | | | -0- | | | $ | 88,500 | |
| | |
(1) | | Norman L. Lowery, the Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, is not included in this table because he is an employee of the Corporation. Donald E. Smith, the Chairman of the Board and President of the Corporation, is also not included in this table because he is an employee of the Corporation. The compensation received by Mr. Lowery and Mr. Smith as employees of the Corporation is shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 23. |
2012.
7
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fees Earned or | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Paid in Cash | | | | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| W. Curtis Brighton | | $ | 75,000 | | | | (1 | ) | | $ | 75,000 | |
| B. Guille Cox | | | 76,600 | | | | | | | | 76,600 | |
| Thomas Dinkel | | | 79,300 | | | | | | | | 79,300 | |
| Anton H. George | | | 79,600 | | | | | | | | 79,600 | |
| Gregory L. Gibson | | | 72,600 | | | | | | | | 72,600 | |
| William H. Krieble | | | 75,600 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 75,600 | |
| Ronald K. Rich | | | 82,700 | | | | | | | | 82,700 | |
| Virginia L. Smith | | | 81,300 | | | | | | | | 81,300 | |
| William J. Voges | | | 79,300 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 79,300 | |
| | |
(2) | | Amounts reported represent fees earned for serving on the Board of Directors of the Corporation, the Board of Directors of the Bank and committees of the Board of the Corporation during 2009. |
|
(3) | (1) | Members of the Board of Directors have the ability to defer a portion of their director fees under the First Financial Corporation 2005 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. For a more detailed discussion of this plan, see the narrative immediately following these footnotes. |
|
(4) | | Amounts reported represent compensation earned pursuant to participation in the Corporation’s 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy on page 13. |
|
(5) | | Amounts reported represent benefits earned pursuant to participation in the Corporation’s Employee Group Health Plan. |
First Financial Corporation Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors of the Corporation and the Bank may participate in the First Financial Corporation 2005 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Under this plan, a director may defer up to $6,000 of his or her director’s fees each year over a five-year period provided that the director timely submits a deferral election to the Corporation. The amount of deferred fees is used to purchase an insurance product, of which the Corporation is the beneficiary, of, that funds benefit payments. An amount equal to the face amount of the policy will be paid to the director in addition to an amount equal to the tax savings the Corporation will receive by obtaining the proceeds from the policy on a tax-free basis. Payment will be made to the director in 120 monthly installments beginning on the first day of the month after the earlier of the director’s 65th birthday or death. If the director is still a director at the end of the five-year period, then he or she will be entitled to enter into a new deferred fee agreement with the Corporation and/or the Bank. Each year from the initial date of deferral until payments begin, the Corporation accrues a non-cash expense which will equal, in the aggregate, the amount of the payments to be made to the director over the ten-year period. If a director fails for any reason, other than death, to serve as a director during the entire five-year period, or the director fails to attend at least 12 regular or special meetings of the Board each year, the amount of benefits paid will be prorated appropriately. For 2009,2012, the allocated cost of the deferred directors’ fees was $183,721.
First Financial$141,680.76.Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Board of Directors believes that directors more effectively represent the Corporation’s shareholders, whose interests they are charged with protecting, if they are shareholders themselves. Therefore, the Board has adopted director stock ownership guidelines applicable to all directors. All directors are required to own a number of shares of the Corporation’s common stock equal in value to three times their annual Corporation 2001retainer for services as a director. Directors are expected to comply with the guidelines as soon as practicable and 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plans. Directors also may be compensated underin no event later than five years after the First Financial Corporation 2001 and 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plans, discussed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” beginning on page 13. Under these plans, after having metdate of their initial election or appointment as a director of the minimum threshold,Corporation. In the case of individuals who were directors when the guidelines became effective, compliance is required within five years of the effective date. Additionally, directors may receive 90%, 100%not dispose of shares of Corporation stock until they have satisfied the guidelines.
Anti-Hedging Policy
The directors, officers, and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging or 110%monetization transactions with respect to the securities of the directors’ “award amount” if the Corporation and the Bank attain certain performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. For 2009, each director earned an award of $51,200 pursuant to the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which amount represented 100% of the director “award amount” under that plan for 2009.
Corporation.Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No memberDuring 2012 and as of the date of this Proxy Statement, none of the members of the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee iswas or was formerlyis an officer or an employee of the Corporation, and no executive officer of the Corporation served or its subsidiaries.
serves on the compensation committee (or any other committee or board of directors performing a similar function) of any company that employed or employs any member of the Corporation’s Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee or Board of Directors.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Certain family relationships exist among the directors and executive officers of the Corporation. Donald E. Smith (the Chairman of the Board and President of the Corporation) is the father of Virginia L. Smith (a director of the Corporation), and is the father-in-law of Norman L. Lowery (the Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and the President and Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Bank) and the grandfather of Norman D. Lowery (the Chief Operating Officer of First Financial Bank N.A.). Norman D. Lowery is also the son of Norman L. Lowery. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the directors and executive officers pursuant to which any of them have been selected for their respective positions.
8
The Audit Committee is responsible for approving any transactions between the Corporation or its subsidiaries and any related party, including loans or extensions of credit and any sale of assets or other financial transactions. Directors and principalexecutive officers of the Corporation and their associates were customers of, and have had transactions with, the Corporation and its subsidiary bankssubsidiaries in the ordinary course of business during 2009.2012. Comparable transactions may be expected to take place in the future. During 20092012, various directors and executive officers of the Corporation and their respective associates were indebted to the subsidiary banks from time to time. These loans were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for similar transactions with other persons not related to the Corporation and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Loans made to directors and executive officers are in compliance with federal banking regulations and thereby are exempt from the insider loan prohibitions included in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Related party transactions are evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of the Corporation.
The provisions of the Articles of Incorporation apply to contracts or transactions between the Corporation and (i) any Director;director; or (ii) any corporation, unincorporated association, business trust, estate, partnership, trust, joint venture, individual or other legal entity in which any Directordirector has a material financial interest. The provisions of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics apply to the Directors,directors, officers and employees of the Corporation.
The Articles of Incorporation provide that contracts or transactions between the Corporation and any of the persons described above are valid for all purposes, if the material facts of the contract or transactions and the Director’sdirector’s interest were disclosed or known to the Board of Directors, a committee of the Board of Directors with authority to act thereon, or the shareholders entitled to vote thereon, and the Board of Directors, such committee or such shareholders authorized, approved or ratified the contract or transaction.
The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics provides that Directors,directors, officers and employees of the Corporation must make business decisions for the Corporation free of conflicting influences. Such persons are expected to avoid situations that may lead to real or apparent material conflicts between such person’s self interest and their duties or responsibilities as a Director,director, officer or employee of the Corporation.
The Senior Compliance Officer is responsible for annually reaffirming compliance with thisthe Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by the Directors,directors, officers and employees of the Corporation.
During 2009,2012, Platolene 500, Inc., an indirect subsidiary of Deep Vein Coal Company, Inc., received payments for providing fuel and services to First Financial Bank N.A. in the amount of approximately $124,229.$196,005.06. Donald E. Smith (the Chairman of the Board and President of the Corporation), is a Director and Chairman of Platolene 500. Virginia L. Smith (the daughter of Mr. Smith and a director of the Corporation), and Sarah J. Lowery, the daughter of Mr. Smith and wife of Norman L. Lowery (the Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation), each own in the aggregate greater than a 10%27% equity interest in Deep Vein Coal Company, Inc. and serve as the Chairman, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Vice President, respectively, of Platolene 500, Inc.
9
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Corporation aspires to the highest ethical standards for its employees, officers and directors and remains committed to the interests of its shareholders. The Corporation believes it can achieve these objectives with a plan for corporate governance that clearly defines responsibilities, sets high standards of conduct and promotes compliance with the law. The Board of Directors has adopted policies and procedures designed to foster the appropriate level of corporate governance. SomeCertain of these procedures are discussed below.
Consideration of Director Candidates
The Board of Directors seeks directors who represent a variety of backgrounds and experiences which will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions. When searching for new candidates, the Governance and Nominating Committee (“the Committee”) considers the evolving needs of the Board and searches for candidates who will fill any current or anticipated gaps. The Governance and Nominating Committee initiallygenerally considers, among other matters, a candidate’s experiences, skills, expertise, diversity, personal and professional integrity, character, business experience, educational experience or equivalent lifetime experience, background, stature, judgment, conflicts of interest, integrity, ethics, commitment, reputation, time available to serve, community involvement, civic-mindedness,dedication, conflicts of interest and ability to oversee the Corporation’s business and affairs. The Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a formal diversity policy; however, both the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee believe it essential that Board members represent diverse experiences and viewpoints. The Governance and Nominating Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials. With respect to Directorsdirectors who are nominated for re-election, the Governance and Nominating Committee also considers the Director’ssuch director’s previous contributions to the Board. The background
Board Leadership Structure and qualificationsLead Independent Director
Our Board of each current Director including those standing for re-election are:
Donald E. Smith has served onDirectors regularly reviews and assesses the effectiveness of our leadership structure and will implement any changes as it deems appropriate. In February 2013, the Board of
First Financial Corporation since 1983 and currently servesDirectors established the size of the Board at 10, effective as
of the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders.Our Chairman of the Board and President of the Company. He also servedserves as theour President, and our Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Bank for 23 years. Mr. Smith is a member of the Acquisition, Executive and Discount Committees. He also is the Chairman of the Board of Princeton Mining Company, Inc., Deep Vein Coal Company, R.J. Oil Company, and Lynch Coal Operators Reciprocal Association. Mr. Smith is a past member of the Boards of Trustees of Indiana State University and Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
W. Curtis Brighton joined the Board in 2004 and is a current member of the Loan Review, Enterprise Risk, Discount and Loan Policy and Procedures Committees. Mr. Brighton is the President of Hulman and Company. Prior to accepting that position in 2009, he was Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Brighton has been the General Manager of Lynch Coal Operators Reciprocal Association since 1985 and was a private practice Attorney for 12 years. He serves on the Boards of Templeton Coal Company, Inc., Deep Vein Coal Company, Inc., Princeton Mining Company, Inc., R.J. Oil Company, Inc., Union Hospital, Inc. and Lynch Coal Operators Reciprocal Association. Mr. Brighton earned a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Indiana State University and a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from Drake University.
B. Guille Cox has served on the First Financial Corporation Board since 1983 and is the Chairman of the Trust Committee. He also serves on the Investment, Discount, and Governance / Nominating Committees. Mr. Cox has been a Senior Partner in the Law Firm Cox, Zwerner, Gambill & Sullivan since 1980. He also serves on the Boards of Hendrich Title Company and Katzenbach Inc. As a Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Board Member Mr. Cox serves on the Executive and Investment Committees. Mr. Cox received a B.S. degree in Physics from MIT and a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from Harvard Law School.
Thomas T. Dinkel joined the Board in 1989 and serves on the Operations, Audit, Community Reinvestment Act, Loan Review, Investment Services, and Discount Committees. Mr. Dinkel has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Sycamore Engineering, Inc., Dinkel Associates, Sycamore Building Corporation and Dinkel Telekom since 1986 and has held various positions in the Company since 1966. Mr. Dinkel serves on the Board of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and is Chairman of the Business Administration and Compensation Committee. Additionally he serves on the Facilities, Investment Management, President Evaluation, Executive and Student Affairs Committees at Rose-Hulman. He earned his B.S. degree from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
Anton H. George joined the Board in 1989. He serves on the Discount Committee and is Chairperson of both the Audit and Compensation and Employee Benefits Committees. Mr. George is the past President and Chief Executive Officer of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway and Hulman and Company. He also is a current Director of Vectren Corporation. Mr. George earned a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Indiana State University.
10
Gregory L. Gibson joined the First Financial Corporation Board in 1994 and serves on the Loan Review and Discount Committees. Mr. Gibson is the President of ReTec, Inc. and serves on the Board of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College. Mr. Gibson has also served on the Indiana Judicial Commission and is currently serving on the Indiana Port Commission as well as the Board of Directors for the Methodist Health Foundation in Indianapolis. He holds a B.S. degree from Rose Hulman.
William R. Krieble joined the Board in 2009 and serves on the Discount, Community Reinvestment Act and Affirmative Action Committees. Mr. Krieble is the Program Director for the Division of Disability and Rehabilitative Services of the State of Indiana where he has served since 1970. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees from Indiana State University.
Norman L. Lowery joined the First Financial Corporation Board in 1989. He serves on the Acquisition, Affirmative Action, Asset Liability, Community Reinvestment Act, Disaster Recovery, Disclosure, Discount, Executive, Enterprise Risk Management, Loan Policy and Procedures, Loan Review and the Strategic Planning Committees. Mr. Lowery is the Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Corporation. He is also the President and Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Bank, serving since 1996. Prior to joining First Financial Corporation, Mr. Lowery was a Partner in the law firm of Wright, Shagley and Lowery where he practiced for 19 years. Mr. Lowery is a member of the Board of Lynch Coal Operators Reciprocal Association and the Indiana State University Board of Trustees. He received a B.S. degree in Political Science from Indiana State University and a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from Indiana University.
Ronald K. Rich joined the Board in 2005 and serves as the Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee. He is a member of the Discount, Compensation and Employee Benefits, Audit and Governance and Nominating Committees. Mr. Rich has been a Financial Representative for Northwestern Mutual Financial Network since 1963. He holds CLU and CHFC designations from American College.
Virginia L. Smith has served on the Board since 1987. She is a member of the Loan Review, Loan Policy and Procedures, Affirmative Action, Discount and Executive Committees. Ms. Smith has been the President of Princeton Mining Company, Inc. since 1990. She serves on the Boards of Deep Vein Coal Company, Princeton Mining Company, R.J. Oil Company and Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College. Ms. Smith received a B.S. degree in Education from Indiana State University and a B.S. in Business Administration from St. Mary-of-the-Woods College.
William J. Voges joined the Board in 2008 and serves on the Compensation and Employee Benefits, Governance and Nominating and Discount Committees. Mr. Voges has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Root Company since 1996 and as General Counsel of the Root Company since 1990. Prior to joining the Root Company, he was a Partner in Fink, Loucks, Sweet, and Voges for nine years. Mr. Voges also serves as Chairman of the Board for Consolidated-Tomoka Land Company (a public company listed on the NYSE-AMEX under the symbol CTO), where he has prior service on the Audit, Executive and Corporate Governance Committees. He has prior experience on the Boards of several financial institutions. Mr. Voges received his B.S. in Business Administration from Stetson University and his J.D. from Stetson College of Law.
director. The Board
of Directors has separated the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The
CEOChief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Corporation and the
day to dayday-to-day leadership and performance of the
Corproation,Corporation, while the Chairman provides guidance to the
CEOChief Executive Officer and sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board.
Because Mr. Smith,Eight of our Chairman, is an employee forDirectors are considered independent under the Corporation and is therefore not “independent,” ourrequirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The Board of Directors has appointed the Chairman of ourGovernance and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Ronald K. Rich, to serve as “presiding director”our lead independent director to preside at all meetings of the independent directors. As lead independent director, Mr. Rich acts as a liaison between the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. He also develops the agendas for the executive sessions. The independent directors met four times during 2009.
For further2012.We believe that the separate responsibilities of, and coordination between, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and our lead independent director enhances our Board of Directors’ oversight of communications with our shareholders and is an effective leadership structure for our circumstances. Our Board of Directors also believes that the separately defined roles of the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and lead independent director provide for effective corporate governance and enable the Chief Executive Officer to focus his time and energy on operating and managing the Corporation while leveraging the experiences and perspectives of the Chairman and Lead Independent Director.
We recognize that no single leadership model is right for all companies and at all times. Our Board recognizes that, depending on the circumstances, other leadership models might be appropriate at some point and our Board of Directors periodically reviews its leadership structure in this regard.
Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors has an active role, as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing management of the Corporation’s risks. The Board regularly reviews information regarding the Corporation’s financial results, operations and liquidity, as well as the risks associated with each. The Audit Committee oversees management of the Corporation’s financial risks, including electronic versionsthe oversight of our Codeinternal audit function and potential conflicts of Business Conductinterest. The Compensation and Ethics, AuditEmployee Benefits Committee Charter, Compensationis responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Corporation’s executive compensation plans and arrangements. The Governance and Nominating Committee Charter and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter please contactmanages risks associated with the Secretaryindependence of the Corporation, Rodger A. McHargue, FirstBoard of Directors. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee advises and assists the Board in its oversight and management of enterprise risk. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee is comprised of Board members W. Curtis Brighton, William R. Krieble and Ronald K. Rich, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Corporation, One First Financial Plaza, P.O. Box 540,Officer, the Chief Credit Officer, Chief Risk Officer, the heads of Legal, Operations, Human Resources, Loan Review, Auditing, Information Technology and representatives from The Morris Plan Company of Terre Haute Indiana 47808, (812) 238-6000, or visit our website atwww.first-online.com.
11
Director Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that a majority of the members of the Board, including Messrs. Cox, Krieble, Rich, George, Dinkel, Voges, Brighton and Voges,Gibson, are independent, as independence is defined under revised listing standards of the NasdaqNASDAQ Global Select Market applicable to the Corporation.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines containing general principles regarding the functions of the Board of Directors and its committees. The Governance and Nominating Committee periodically reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines and will recommend changes to the Board as it deems appropriate. A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on the Corporation’s web site atwww.first-online.com on the “Investor Relations” page under the link “Governance Documents”.
Code of Ethics
The CorporationBoard of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to all of the Corporation’s directors, officers and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller. The Corporation intends to disclose any amendments to the Code of Ethics by posting such amendments on its website. In addition, any waivers of the Code of Ethics for directors or executive officers of the Corporation will be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K.
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the Corporation’s web site atwww.first-online.com on the “investor Relations” page under the link “Governance Documents”.Communications with Independent Directors
Any shareholder who desires to contact the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Lead Independent Director or the other members of the Board of Directors, or who desires to make a recommendation of a director candidate for consideration by the Governance/Governance and Nominating Committee, may do so electronically by sending an email to the following address: directors@ffc-in.com. Alternatively, a shareholder can contact the Chairman of the Board, Lead Independent Director, Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee or the other members of the Board by writing to: Chairman, First Financial Corporation, One First Financial Plaza, P.O. Box 540, Terre Haute, INIndiana 47808. The Governance/Governance and Nominating Committee will consider any candidate submitted by a shareholder in the manner described above. Communications received electronically or in writing are distributed to the Chairman of the Board, Lead Independent Director, Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee or the other members of the Board as appropriate depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication received. For example, if any complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters are received, then they will be forwarded by the Secretary to the Chairman of the Audit Committee for review.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Governance Documents
For further information, including electronic versions of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Discussion and Analysis
OverviewEmployee Benefits Committee Charter, and Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, please contact the Secretary of the Compensation Program andCorporation, Rodger A. McHargue, First Financial Corporation, One First Financial Plaza, P.O. Box 540, Terre Haute, Indiana 47808, (812) 238-6000, or visit our website atwww.first-online.com on the Compensation Committee
The Compensation“Investor Relations” page under the link “Governance Documents.”REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
In accordance with its written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee of the Board assisted the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of Directors is responsible for evaluatingthe quality and establishing compensation levelsintegrity of the accounting, auditing and compensation programs forfinancial reporting practices of the Corporation. All of the members of the Audit Committee are independent, as defined in the Corporation’s named executive officers. Thelisting requirements. During 2012, the Audit Committee has established a rangemet 4 times, and the Audit Committee chair, as representative of plansthe Audit Committee, discussed the interim financial information contained in each quarterly earnings announcement with management and programs which are intendedthe independent auditors prior to encourage both current year performance and long-term shareholder value, without exposing the corporation to excessive amounts of risk associatedpublic release.
In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the financial services industry.audit process, the Audit Committee obtained from the independent auditors a formal written statement describing all relationships between the auditors and the Corporation that might bear on the auditors’ independence consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” discussed with the auditors any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the auditors’ independence. The Audit Committee considered allalso discussed with management, the major “operational” risksinternal auditors and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of the Corporation including: credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, reputation risk, compliance risk, and transaction riskCorporation’s internal controls and the added potential for loss that could result from anyinternal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. The Audit Committee reviewed both with the independent and internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.
The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with the independent auditors all communications required by generally accepted auditing standards, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of the compensation plans or programs provided to all employees. Upon reviewindependent auditors’ examination of these risks the financial statements. The Audit Committee has determined that no material adverse effect is likely to occur
Compensation Philosophyalso discussed the results of the internal audit examinations.The Audit Committee reviewed and Objectives
The Compensation Committee’s executive compensation policies are designed to attract and retain highly qualified persons as named executive officers, to provide competitive levels of compensation todiscussed the
named executive officers and to reward the named executive officers for satisfactory individual performance and for satisfactory performanceaudited financial statements of the Corporation as
a whole. Additionally, the policies seek to provide a vehicleof and for the
Committee to evaluateyear ended December 31, 2012, with management and
measure the
performanceindependent auditors. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of the
CorporationCorporation’s financial statements and the
executivesindependent auditors have the responsibility for the examination of those statements.Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management and the independent auditors, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Corporation’s audited financial statements be included in accordanceits Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, for filing with the resultsSecurities and Exchange Commission.
| Members of the Audit Committee |
| Anton H. George, Chairman |
| Thomas T. Dinkel |
| Ronald K. Rich |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Summary
5 Year Shareholder Return.The graph below represents the five-year total return of those evaluations.the Corporation’s stock relative to the Russell 2000 and the SNL Index of Banks $1 - $5 Billion. The individual goals establishedfive-year total return for our stock during this time was 23.73%. During the same period, the return on the Russell 2000 Index was 19.09% and the SNL Index of Banks $1 - $5 Billion actually had a negative return of 24.22%
| | | | | | Period Ending | | | | |
| Index | | 12/31/07 | | | 12/31/08 | | | 12/31/09 | | | 12/31/10 | | | 12/31/11 | | | 12/31/12 | |
| First Financial Corporation | | | 100.00 | | | | 148.59 | | | | 113.77 | | | | 135.04 | | | | 131.74 | | | | 123.73 | |
| Russell 2000 Index | | | 100.00 | | | | 66.21 | | | | 84.20 | | | | 106.82 | | | | 102.36 | | | | 119.09 | |
| SNL U.S. Bank $1B-$5B | | | 100.00 | | | | 82.94 | | | | 59.45 | | | | 67.39 | | | | 61.46 | | | | 75.78 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 Overview. In 2012 the Corporation delivered solid financial performance with net income of $32.8 million, the second highest in the strategic plan and budgethistory of the Corporation. This increase was in part driven by a 9.78% increase in net interest income to $108.9 million. The return on assets for 2012 was 1.13%. During 2012 the Corporation integrated its largest acquisition to date completing the purchase and assumption of Freestar Bank N.A. Also during 2012 the Bank are also utilizedCorporation opened four new de novo branches in setting compensation levels of the named executive officers.southern Indiana expanding into three new markets. The Corporation seeks to achieve these objectives through a blendended the year with $2.9 billion in assets. The compensation of both short and long-term compensation.
12
Role of Named Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
Mr. Smith and Mr. Lowery participate in meetings of the Compensation Committee at which compensation actions involving our named executive officers are discussed. Mr. Smith and Mr. Lowery assist at the invitation of the Committee, by making recommendations regarding compensation actions relating to the named executive officers other than themselves. Mr. Smith and Mr. Lowery each recuses himself and does not participate in any meetings of the Committee at which his or the others compensation is discussed. The other named executive officers do not participate in the meetings of the Committee or in establishing the compensation of the named executive officers.
Elements of Executive Compensation
. Our executive compensation system uses various elements to achieve our compensation objectives, including the following:| Compensation Type | Form | Terms |
| Cash | ·Salary ·Annual incentive compensation | Salary increases are awarded as allocations from the salary pool set by the Compensation Committee and the Board Awards are eligible to be earned upon meeting certain performance goals (net income, return on assets, return on equity, etc.) |
| Equity | ·Restricted Stock | Awards are eligible to be earned upon meeting certain 3-year average performance goals (net income, return on assets, return on equity, etc.). After earned, awards are subject to a 3-year vesting schedule. |
Tax-Qualified Retirement Plans | ·Offset ESOP/
Pension Plan | The Pension Plan provides each participant with a benefit which is offset by the benefit provided by the ESOP. To the extent the ESOP benefit is greater than the Pension Plan benefit, no Pension Plan benefit will be paid. |
| Deferred Compensation | ·Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan ·Executive’s Deferred Compensation Plan | The Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan and Executive’s Deferred Compensation Plan provide supplemental retirement benefits to help recompense for benefits reduced due to IRS rules under the Pension Plan and ESOP, respectively. Amounts payable under the Deferred Compensation Plan will offset amounts payable under the Supplemental Retirement Plan. To the extent the benefit under the Deferred Compensation Plan is greater than the Supplemental Retirement Plan, no Supplemental Retirement Plan benefit will be paid. |
| Other | ·Perquisites | The Bank sponsors a life insurance program for the named executive officers other than Messrs. Smith and Clary. |
| Other Key Compensation Program Features | ·Clawback of incentive compensation ·No excise tax gross ups ·No automatic extension of employment agreement ·Executives share ownership guidelines |
CEO Pay. The Compensation Committee considered the following in determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer:
| · | First Financial Bank N.A.’s 2012 net income was $29.9 million and the net income of the Corporation was $32.8 million. |
| · | The Bank’s Return on Assets and Return on Equity were 1.07% and 8.88% respectively. The Corporation’s Return on Assets and Return on Equity were 1.13% and 9.02% respectively. |
| · | The Corporation’s three-year average earnings per share growth rate was 14.41%. |
| · | The Corporation’s five-year total shareholder return at year end was 23.73%, 4.64% higher than the Russell 2000’s return of 19.09%. |
| · | Under the 2011 Short-Term Incentive Plan, Mr. Lowery achieved a performance level just below target. |
| · | Under the 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, Mr. Lowery achieved a performance level above target. |
Other Executive Pay. The Compensation Committee considered the following in determining the compensation of our other named executive officers:
| · | First Financial Bank N.A.’s 2012 net income was $29.9 million. |
| · | The Bank’s Return on Assets and Return on Equity were 1.07% and 8.88% respectively. |
| · | The Corporation’s three-year average earnings per share growth rate was 14.41%. |
| · | The Corporation’s five-year total shareholder return at year end was 23.73%, 4.64% higher than the Russell 2000’s return of 19.09%. |
| · | Under the 2011 Short-Term Incentive Plan, Named Executive Officers achieved a performance level just below target. |
| · | Under the 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, Named Executive Officers achieved a performance level of maximum. |
Executive Compensation Philosophy
The Committee’s executive compensation policies are designed to attract and retain highly qualified persons as named executive officers, to provide competitive levels of compensation to the named executive officers and to reward the named executive officers for achieving individual performance and for achieving performance of the Corporation as a whole. Additionally, the policies seek to provide a vehicle for the Committee to evaluate and measure the performance of the Corporation and the executives in accordance with the results of those evaluations. The individual goals established in the strategic plan and budget for the Corporation and the Bank are also utilized in setting compensation levels of the named executive officers. The Committee seeks to compensate the named executive officers through a blend of both short and long-term compensation.
The Compensation Committee’s Process for Setting Compensation
The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) is responsible for evaluating and establishing compensation levels and compensation programs for our named executive officers. The Committee has established a range of plans and programs which are intended to encourage current year performance and create long-term shareholder value, without exposing the Corporation to excessive amounts of risk associated with the financial services industry. The Committee considers material “operational” risks of the Corporation, including: credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, reputation risk, compliance risk, transaction risk and the added potential for loss that could result from any of the compensation plans or programs provided to all employees. The Committee also charges the Corporation’s General Auditor with performing a risk assessment of the incentive compensation program. Upon review of these risks and the report of the General Auditor, the Committee determines on an annual basis that the Corporation’s compensation arrangements and policies do not encourage excessive risk-taking.
The compensation programs of the Corporation for itsour named executive officers are administered by or under the direction of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and are reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that remunerationtotal compensation levels and benefits are comparable to other similarly sized corporations within our industry and reasonable using the guidelines described above.competitive. With respect to the named executive officers other than the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee reviews and compares individual performance with respect to individual goals, areadepartment goals and Corporation goals. Because the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer have greater responsibility for the overall operations of the Corporation, the Compensation Committee reviews and compares the following with respect to their compensation:
| • | · | the performance of the Corporation and the Bank compared to previous years and to the budget; |
|
| • | · | past compensation levels for these officers; |
|
| •· | | thecompetitive compensation levels at comparable financial institutions, as discussed below;levels; and |
|
| • | · | total shareholder return. |
The elementsCommittee considers information from a variety of sources, including its compensation consultant, regarding the appropriate mix and levels of the major components of compensation discussed below. The major components of our compensation programs forare comprised of the named executive officersfollowing elements, which are described in more detail below.
Base Salary.Base salarybelow: | · | short-term cash incentive awards; |
| · | performance-based equity awards; and |
| · | employment and post-employment benefits. |
Our Chief Executive Officer, Norman L. Lowery, is a fixed componentinvited to attend Committee meetings at which compensation actions involving our executive officers other than the Chairman and the CEO are discussed. Mr. Lowery assists the Committee by making recommendations for compensation of total cash compensation and is intended to reward theour named executive officers other than himself and the Chairman. Mr. Lowery excuses himself and does not participate in any meetings of the Committee at which either his or the Chairman’s compensation is discussed. Our other executive officers do not participate in any meetings of the Committee or in establishing the compensation of executive officers.
The Committee has authority to retain its own advisors, including compensation consultants. In April 2010, the Committee retained Grant Thornton LLP as its independent compensation consultant to assist the Committee. Grant Thornton did not perform any services for their past performancemanagement and to facilitateinteracted with members of management only under the attractionCommittee’s oversight and retentionwith the knowledge and permission of the Committee chair. Grant Thornton’s duties included the review and design of a skilled and experienced management team. The Boardshort-term incentive plan, the design of Directors establishes a total “pool”long-term incentive plan for salaries for each fiscal year, typically expressed as a percentage increase over the prior year’s total aggregate base salaries. Individual base salary increases for all employees, including the namedkey executive officers, are awarded as allocations froma review of director compensation and the salary pool. In establishing the amountconfirmation of the pool, the Boardcompetitiveness of Directors considers general economic conditions (such as inflation and recessionary factors), the performance of the Corporation and the Bank and other sources of information such as third-party compensation surveys, including Amalfi Consulting, Watson Wyatt, The Conference Board, Mercer, and Culpepper Pay Trends. For 2009, the Compensation Committee established a pool of 3.75% over the prior year’s total aggregate base salaries.
The Compensation Committee does not use the third-party data sources for benchmarking the size of the pool, the base salaries, or any other element of compensation for the named executive officers. Rather, such sources are reviewed and considered by the Compensation Committee in order to stay abreast of current compensation practices, levels and structures and thereby better inform its compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee considers all sources of information together and utilizes its members’ experience and judgment in determining the amount of the pool for base salary increases.
13
With respect to individual namedcertain executive officers annual increases to base salaries are awarded based on the idea that an increase should reward performance and not longevity. Executive officers whose performance may justify an increase could receive a greater allocation from the pool as a base salary increase than do executive officers who have not performed as well during the prior year. Executive officers who have exceeded job expectations may, in the discretionmarket study of the Compensation Committee, be awarded a base salary increase which is greater than the amount which would be otherwise dictated by the size of the pool. Conversely, executive officers who did not meet job expectations may, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, receive little or no percentage increase in base salary. For 2009, the Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretion to award a named executive officer either a base salary increase of greater than the pool for exceeding performance expectations, or no salary increase for failing to meet minimum performance expectations.
More specifically, base salary for a named executive officer is determined after the officer’s performance is reviewed by the Compensation Committee. This review includes an analysis of the performance of the Corporation and the Bank and an analysis of the individual’s performance during the past fiscal year, with a focus on the officer’s goal attainment; supervisory skills; dependability; initiative; attendance; overall skill level; and overall value to the Corporation. In addition, when setting base salaries, the Compensation Committee also reviews certain third-party surveys such as the Indiana Banker’s Association Financial Institutions Compensation Survey. The Compensation Committee has not attempted to rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the factors that it considers. The Compensation Committee considers all of the factors as a whole and collectively makes its decision with respect to base salaries in light of the factors that each of the members consider important.
With respect to the determination of the base salary increase for the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the factors above as well as the compensation levels of comparable peers in the same geographical area (generally, this consists of31 financial institutions
in Midwestern markets with
comparable demographics as the Corporation with assetsasset ranges between $2 billion and
$5 billion). With respect$4.5 billion. In connection with Grant Thornton’s recommendations, the Board adopted the 2011 Short Term Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan which was approved by our shareholders at our 2011 annual meeting and is described below under the heading “2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.”In 2012 the Committee again retained Grant Thornton to consult with the Chief Executive Officer,Committee regarding current compensation practices. Grant Thornton provided a banking industry update, a regulatory update on compensation and corporate governance topics and other topics related to First Financial Corporation and its compensation plans.
In connection with its retention of Grant Thornton, the Compensation Committee also considersdetermined that no conflict of interest exists that would impair the termsability of Mr. Lowery’s employment agreement. Specifically, priorGrant Thornton to serve as a Change in Control (as discussed in “Potential Payment Upon Termination or Change in Control of the Corporation” on page 27), the Compensation Committee may only declare decreases in the base salary awarded to Mr. Lowery if the operating results of the Bank are significantly less favorable than thosecompensation consultant for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001Committee.
Components of Executive Compensation
The Committee uses several tools to compensate and the Bank makes similar decreases in the base salary it pays to othermotivate executive officers ofto achieve the Bank. Additional information concerning Mr. Lowery’s employment agreement is provided belowCorporation’s goals.
| · | Base Salary.Base salary is a fixed component of total cash compensation and is intended to reward executive officers for their past performance and to facilitate the attraction and retention of a skilled and experienced management team. The Committee considers several factors in establishing base salaries: |
| o | Salary Pool.The Committee establishes, and the Board of Directors approves, a total “pool” for salaries for each fiscal year, typically expressed as a percentage increase over the prior year’s total aggregate base salaries. Individual base salary increases for all employees, including the named executive officers, are awarded as allocations from the salary pool. In establishing the amount of the pool, the Committee and the Board of Directors considers general economic conditions (such as inflation and recessionary factors), the performance of the Corporation and the Bank and other sources of information such as third-party compensation surveys, including the Crowe Horwath Financial Institutions Compensation Survey (consisting of a survey for Indiana, Illinois, and the Midwest), the Delves Group Bank Cash Compensation Survey, the Compensation Data Surveys for Banking and Finance, the American Bankers Association Compensation and Benefits Survey, and surveys provided by AON-Hewitt, The Hay Group, The Conference Board, Mercer and Towers Watson. |
| o | Consultant Input. In 2012, the Committee retained Grant Thornton to confirm that total compensation for select positions was competitive. As discussed above, Grant Thornton provided the Committee with market trend information, data and recommendations regarding the alignment of pay and performance. Grant Thornton also recommended that the base pay element of total compensation be used as the platform for the determination of total compensation. |
| o | Third Party Data Sources. The Committee does not use any third-party data sources, including information provided by Grant Thornton, for benchmarking the size of the salary pool, the size of base salaries or any other element of compensation for the narrative under “Employment Agreements.” As of this time, the Compensation Committee has never decreased Mr. Lowery’s base salary.Similar to the manner in which the Compensation Committee uses third-party survey data in a general manner to inform its decision with respect to the amount of the base salary pool, the Compensation Committee uses the Indiana Banker’s Association Financial Institutions Compensation Survey and other data in a general manner to inform its decisions with respect to setting the base salary of the individual named executive officers. Rather, such sources are reviewed and considered by the Committee in order to stay abreast of current compensation practices, levels and structures and thereby better inform its compensation decisions. The Committee considers all sources of information together and utilizes its members’ experience and judgment in determining the amount of the pool for base salary increases.
|
| o | Rewarding Performance Rather than Longevity. With respect to individual executive officers, annual increases to base salaries are awarded based on the idea that an increase should reward performance and not longevity. Executive officers whose performance may justify an increase could receive a greater allocation from the pool as a base salary increase than do executive officers who have not performed as well during the prior year. Executive officers who have exceeded job expectations may, in the discretion of the Committee, be awarded a base salary increase which is greater than the amount which would be otherwise dictated by the size of the pool. Conversely, executive officers who did not meet job expectations may, in the discretion of the Committee, receive little or no percentage increase in base salary. |
| o | Analysis of Individual Performance. More specifically, base salary for a named executive officer is determined after the officer’s performance is reviewed by the Committee. This review includes an analysis of the performance of the Corporation and the Bank and an analysis of the individual’s performance during the past fiscal year, with a focus on the officer’s goal attainment; supervisory skills; dependability; initiative; overall skill level; and overall value to the Corporation. The Committee has not attempted to rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the factors that it considers. The Committee considers all of the factors as a whole and collectively makes its decision with respect to base salaries in light of the factors that each of the members considers important. |
| o | Determinations for the Chairman and the CEO. With respect to the determination of the base salary increase for the Chairman of the Board and President and for the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee reviews and considers the factors and third-party data sources discussed above. In determining the base salary increase for the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee also considers the terms of Mr. Lowery’s employment agreement, which requires a minimum annual base salary of $620,297. Under the terms of the employment agreement, prior to a Change in Control (as discussed below in “Potential Payment Upon Termination or Change in Control of the Corporation”), the Committee only may decrease the base salary awarded to Mr. Lowery if the operating results of the Bank are significantly less favorable than those for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 and the Bank makes similar decreases in the base salary it pays to other executive officers of the Bank. Additional information concerning Mr. Lowery’s employment agreement is provided below under “Employment Agreement with Norman L. Lowery.” |
The Compensation Committee does not benchmark the base salaries or any other element of compensation for the named executive officers against these data sources.
The Compensation Committee has not established a policy or a specific formula for determining the amount or relative percentage of total compensation which should be derived by the named executive officers from their base salary. Rather, the Compensation Committee considers all of the information available to it and utilizes its members’ experience and judgment in determining the amount of the base salaries of the named executive officers.
14
| · | Incentive Compensation.The Corporation’s cash incentive programs are intended to align employees’ goals with the Corporation’s revenue and earnings growth objectives. The programs consist of the following: |
| o | 2011 Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. The Corporation sponsors the First Financial Corporation 2011 Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2011 STIP”). Awards under the 2011 STIP are based upon the specific “award amount” for each individual specified. Under the 2011 STIP, threshold performance incentives must be met in order for an award to be earned. Payouts for each of the named executive officers equal 80% of the respective target award for performance at threshold, 100% of the respective target award for performance at target, and 125% or 120% for tiers 1 and 2 respectively, of the respective target award for maximum performance. The Committee spends a significant amount of time analyzing financial measures and determining the level of performance required to receive threshold, target and maximum annual incentive payouts. The Committee established the performance incentives in amounts which it believes to be achievable given a sustained effort on the part of the named executive officers and which require increasingly greater effort to achieve the target and superior objectives. The annual incentive opportunities for each of the named executive officers are based upon weighted performance measures which are determined by the Committee based upon its assessment of what is important to the Corporation’s and the Bank’s overall performance and within the scope of control of the respective named executive officers. The award calculation interpolates the interval between target and threshold or target and maximum. The aggregate result is used to determine the amount earned for each.Payment of any earned awards under the 2011 STIP will be made within 75 days after the end of the calendar year provided the employee is still employed on that date. |
| o | 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.We believe that equity-based compensation is a means of creating a long-term link between the compensation provided to executive officers and other key management personnel with gains realized by the shareholders. We believe it is essential to our future to have this flexibility in order to attract, retain and motivate our executive officers and other key employees who make significant contributions to our success and allow them to share in that success. At the 2011 annual meeting the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Financial Corporation 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 EIP”) which provides for awards of incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and long-term cash incentives. |
| · | Employment and Post-Employment Benefits.The Committee believes that retirement and other post-employment benefits can be a powerful motivational tool for executives. The programs of this type used by the Committee include the following: |
| o | 401(k) Savings Plan. The First Financial Corporation Employees’ 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”) is a qualified salary reduction plan within the meaning of Code Section 401(k) available to substantially all of the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Under the Savings Plan all eligible employees may elect to have a portion of their compensation deferred and contributed to their individual accounts under the Savings Plan. Participants direct the investment of their Savings Plan account. |
| o | ESOP and Pension Plan.The Corporation sponsors the First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”) and the First Financial Corporation Employees’ Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”) for the benefit of substantially all of the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. These plans together constitute a “floor offset” retirement program, so that the Pension Plan provides each participant with a minimum benefit which is offset by the benefit provided by the ESOP. Under the terms of the ESOP, the Corporation and subsidiaries and affiliates who participate in the ESOP may contribute Corporation stock or cash which will be primarily invested in Corporation stock. The amount of contributions, when they are made, is determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. Under the terms of the Pension Plan, the monthly guaranteed minimum benefit under the Pension Plan is reduced by the monthly benefit derived from the vested portion of the participant’s ESOP account balance, calculated by the actuary for the Pension Plan as a single life annuity. Unless the participant elects an alternate form of benefit under the Pension Plan, the normal retirement benefit, if any, payable under the Pension Plan, will begin at the later of the participant’s retirement or age 65 and be paid monthly for as long as the participant lives. The Pension Plan allows for an early retirement benefit equal to a participant’s accrued benefit, determined before the reduction for the monthly ESOP benefit, reduced by 1/180 for each full month for the first five years and 1/360 for each full month for the next five years that the commencement of benefit payments precedes the participant’s normal retirement date. Mr. Clary is eligible for early retirement under the Pension Plan. |
| o | First Financial Corporation 2001 and 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plans.The Corporation sponsors the First Financial Corporation 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”), effective January 1, 2001, and the First Financial Corporation 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), effective January 1, 2005, which are unfunded, nonqualified plans of deferred compensation for directors and certain executive officers. The 2001 Plan was frozen effective December 31, 2004 to exempt all amounts under the 2001 Plan from the application of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Board adopted the 2005 Plan as a replacement plan, effective January 1, 2005. The terms of the 2005 Plan comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A and related guidance. The 2005 Plan terminated on December 31, 2009 according to the stated term. Payments under the 2001 and 2005 Plans generally do not begin until the earlier of January 1, 2015, or the January 1 immediately following the year in which the participant reaches age 65. Payment may also be made upon death, disability, change in control or termination for other than cause. Mr. Smith began receiving payment of his benefits in January 2010 and Mr. Lowery began receiving payments of his benefits in January 2012. Payments are in cash only and are generally made in 180 equal consecutive monthly installments. |
| o | Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan. The First Financial Corporation Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “ESRP”) provides supplemental retirement benefits for a select group of management or highly compensated employees to help recompense the employees for benefits reduced due to the imposition of Code limitations on benefits under the Pension Plan. Amounts payable under the ESRP are offset by amounts payable under the First Financial Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan. The ESRP was frozen effective December 31, 2004 to exempt all amounts under the ESRP from Code Section 409A. The Board adopted the First Financial Corporation 2005 Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “2005 ESRP”) as a replacement plan, effective January 1, 2005, to comply with Code Section 409A. Amounts payable under the ESRP will be offset by amounts payable under the First Financial Corporation Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “EDC Plan”) and amounts payable under the 2005 ESRP will be offset by amounts payable under the First Financial Corporation 2005 Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2005 EDC Plan”). |
| o | Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan.The EDC Plan permits a select group of management or highly compensated employees to elect to defer compensation from the employers without regard to the limitations imposed by the Code on the amount of compensation which may be deferred. The EDC Plan also provides for a supplemental ESOP benefit which is equal to the amount of the benefit a participant would have been allocated under the ESOP if not for the limitations imposed by the Code on the ESOP. Amounts payable under the supplemental ESOP portion of the EDC Plan will offset amounts payable under the ESRP. The EDC Plan was frozen effective December 31, 2004 to exempt all amounts accrued under the EDC from Code Section 409A. The Board adopted the 2005 EDC Plan as a replacement plan, effective January 1, 2005, to comply with Code Section 409A. Amounts payable under the 2005 EDC Plan will offset amounts payable under the 2005 ESRP. |
| o | Perquisites. The Corporation provides very limited perquisites to executive officers; however, it does sponsor a life insurance program for the named executive officers of the Bank other than Messrs. Smith and Clary. Under the life insurance program, the Bank purchased a whole life insurance policy on behalf of, and pays the premiums on behalf of, each executive officer of the Bank. The policy is owned by the individual and is intended to be fully paid at age 65 for those who were 55 or older, and at age 60 for those who were less than 55 years of age at the time the individual joined the Bank. |
Annual Bonus Amounts.TheExecutive Compensation
for2012In 2012, the Committee is responsible for the determination of whether an annual bonus should be recommended to the Board for the named executive officers. It has not established a policy or a specific formula for determining the amount or relative percentage of total compensation which should be derived by the named executive officers from annual bonus paymentsreviewed individual and has discretion to consider such factors as it determines appropriate. Historically, the determination has been based upon the overall performance of the Corporation and the Bank relative to the established budget, the attainment of Region, Department, and individual goals. In the event that the Compensation Committee determines that a bonus payment is appropriate in light of the performance of the Company and the Bank, the specific amounts are determined subjectively by the Compensation Committee based upon its evaluation of the Corporation’s and the Bank’s performance to the respective budgets and prior yearcompany performance as well as expected trends in executive compensation in the Compensation Committee’s evaluation ofbanking industry. That review included the future prospectsfollowing:
| · | Corporate Performance.In 2012 the Corporation delivered solid financial performance with net income of $32.8 million, the second highest in the history of the Corporation. This increase was in part driven by a 9.78% increase in net interest income to $108.9 million. The return on assets for 2012 was 1.13%. During 2012 the Corporation integrated its largest acquisition to date completing the purchase and assumption of Freestar Bank N.A. Also during 2012 the Corporation opened four new de novo branches in southern Indiana expanding into three new markets. The Corporation ended the year with $2.9 billion in assets. |
| · | Grant Thornton.As discussed above, in 2012, the Committee retained Grant Thornton to confirm that total compensation for select positions was competitive. As discussed previously, Grant Thornton provided the Committee with market trend information, data and recommendations regarding the alignment of pay and performance. Grant Thornton also recommended that the base pay element of total compensation be used as the platform for the determination of total compensation. After reviewing the third-party data sources and information from Grant Thornton, the Committee established a pool for 2012 of 2.9% over the prior year’s total aggregate base salaries. |
Based on its review, the Corporation and the Bank.
For 2009, the Compensation Committee determined and the Board approved, in light of the Corporation’s and the Bank’s performance relative to budgeted growth of total assets, net loans, deposits, shareholder equity, budgeted net income, return on assets, return on equity, capital to assets, efficiency ratio, earnings per share, and dividends paid, a bonus payment to each of the named executive officers, in the amounts set forth in the Summary Compensation table. Because we endeavor to establish and pay remuneration levels and benefits which are comparable to other similarly sized corporations within our industry, as discussed above, and do not have a “formula” driven bonus plan the Compensation Committee has determined to pay the amount of bonus for 2009 as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. The Compensation Committee has determined that such amount and the aggregate amount of salary and bonus is reasonable, given the performance of the Corporation for 2009 as compared to the performance measures listed above and has not varied the amount of the bonus payments from the prior year’s level.
First Financial Corporation 2001 and 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plans.Beginning in 1999, the Board began discussions with several consultants regarding compensation programs. These discussions focused on an analysis of compensation programs of other financial institutions and what actions were needed to provide comparable compensation packages to directors, officers and key employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. These discussions and the analysis of the information received culminated with the adoption by the Board in November 2000 of the First Financial Corporation 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”), effective January 1, 2001.
The 2001 Plan was designed to enhance the Corporation’s value to stockholders by attracting and retaining qualified directors, officers and other key employees and by providing further incentive for directors, officers and other key employees to give their maximum effort to the continued growth and success of the Corporation. The 2001 Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified plan of deferred compensation which is administered by the Compensation Committee. The 2001 Plan was frozen effective December 31, 2004 to exempt all amounts under the 2001 Plan from the application of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Board adopted the First Financial Corporation 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) as a replacement plan, effective January 1, 2005. The terms of the 2005 Plan comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A and related guidance. Collectively the 2001 Plan and 2005 Plan are referred to as the “Plans.”
Directors and executive officers who are considered highly compensated employees and who are age 65 or under are eligible to participate in the 2005 Plan; however, the Compensation Committee exempted Mr. Smith from the age limitations at each Plan’s inception and exempted Mr. Rich, who did not become a director until 2005, from the age limitation of the 2005 Plan. The Compensation Committee has designated as participants in the 2005 Plan all directors of the Corporation, the executive officers listed in the summary compensation table on page 23 and certain other officers. Individuals are not eligible to receive awards under the Plans after age 65, except for Messrs. Smith and Rich.
Awards under the 2005 Plan are based upon the specific “award amount” for each individual specified. There are four tiers of participants, with a different award amount specified for each tier. The first tier consists of Mr. Smith and Mr. Lowery; the second tier consists of Messrs. Carty, White and Clary; the third tier consists of other senior officers; and the fourth tier consists of the directors. The award amounts were established after discussions with, and receipt of, advice from the Corporation’s consultant (the predecessor to Clark Consulting) when the 2001 Plan was established, who had performed an analysis of a peer group of companies for the Corporation and the financial institutions industry generally.
following: | · | Base Salaries Consistent with Pool. For 2012, the Committee did not exercise its discretion to award a named executive officer either (1) a base salary increase of greater than the pool for exceeding performance expectations or (2) no salary increase for failing to meet minimum performance expectations. |
| · | 2011 Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. Awards under the 2011 STIP are based upon the specific “award amount” for each individual specified. Threshold performance incentives must be met in order for an award to be earned. There are four tiers of participants, with a different award amount specified for each tier. The first tier for 2012 consisted of Mr. Smith and Mr. Norman L. Lowery; the second tier consisted of Messrs. McHargue, Clary and Norman D. Lowery; the third and fourth tier consisted of other senior officers. The award amounts were established after discussions with, and receipt of advice from, the Corporation’s consultant, Grant Thornton. |
15
Under the incentive plan, threshold performance objectives must be met in order for any awards to occur. Payouts for each of the named executive officers equal 90% of the respective target award for performance at threshold, 100% of the respective target award for performance at target, and 110% of the respective target award for superior performance. The Compensation Committee spends a significant amount of time analyzing financial measures and determining the level of performance required to receive threshold, target and superior annual incentive payouts. The Compensation Committee established the performance objectives in amounts which it believes to be achievable given a sustained effort on the part of the named executive officers and which require increasingly greater effort to achieve the target and superior objectives. The Compensation Committee may increase or decrease the performance targets and the potential payouts at each performance target, if, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, the circumstances warrant such an adjustment. The Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretion in this regard in 2009.
The annual incentive opportunities for each of the named executive officers are based upon weighted factorsperformance measures which are determined by the Compensation Committee.For awards made in 2012 which are payable in 2013 and awards made 2013 which are payable in 2014 to the extent they are earned, the performance measures were/are weighted as follows:| | | Net Income | | | Return on Assets | | | Return on Equity | | | Contribution to Income | | | Total Loan Growth | | | Asset Quality | | | Net Charge-offs | | | Loan Spread | |
| Donald E. Smith | | | 33.33 | % | | | 33.33 | % | | | 33.34 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | | 33.33 | % | | | 33.33 | % | | | 33.34 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | | 33.33 | % | | | 33.33 | % | | | 33.34 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | | 10.00 | % | | | 10.00 | % | | | 10.00 | % | | | 15.00 | % | | | 20.00 | % | | | 10.00 | % | | | 10.00 | % | | | 15.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | | 33.33 | % | | | 33.33 | % | | | 33.34 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
These 2012 performance measures are compared to goal and weighted accordingly. The goals for each of these executive officers are shown in the following table. Donald E. Smith’s goals are based upon itson the performance of First Financial Corporation. Messrs N.L. Lowery, McHargue, N.D. Lowery, and Clary’s goals are based on the performance of First Financial Bank.
| Measure | | Level | | | Smith | | | NL Lowery | | | McHargue | | | ND Lowery | | | Clary | |
| | | | Threshold | | | $ | 26,226 | | | $ | 24,472 | | | $ | 24,472 | | | $ | 24,472 | | | $ | 24,472 | |
| Net Income | | | Target | | | $ | 32,783 | | | $ | 30,590 | | | $ | 30,590 | | | $ | 30,590 | | | $ | 30,590 | |
| | | | Maximum | | | $ | 40,979 | | | $ | 38,238 | | | $ | 36,708 | | | $ | 36,708 | | | $ | 36,708 | |
| | | | Actual | | | $ | 32,812 | | | $ | 29,931 | | | $ | 29,931 | | | $ | 29,931 | | | $ | 29,931 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Threshold | | | | 0.89 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.86 | % |
| Return on | | | Target | | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.07 | % | | | 1.07 | % | | | 1.07 | % | | | 1.07 | % |
| Assets | | | Maximum | | | | 1.39 | % | | | 1.34 | % | | | 1.28 | % | | | 1.28 | % | | | 1.28 | % |
| | | | Actual | | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.07 | % | | | 1.07 | % | | | 1.07 | % | | | 1.07 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Threshold | | | | 7.26 | % | | | 7.39 | % | | | 7.39 | % | | | 7.39 | % | | | 7.39 | % |
| Return on | | | Target | | | | 9.07 | % | | | 9.24 | % | | | 9.24 | % | | | 9.24 | % | | | 9.24 | % |
| Equity | | | Maximum | | | | 11.34 | % | | | 11.55 | % | | | 11.09 | % | | | 11.09 | % | | | 11.09 | % |
| | | | Actual | | | | 9.02 | % | | | 8.88 | % | | | 8.88 | % | | | 8.88 | % | | | 8.88 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Threshold | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 33,612 | |
| Contribution | | | Target | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 42,015 | |
| to Income | | | Maximum | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 50,418 | |
| | | | Actual | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 40,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Threshold | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15.14 | % |
| Total Loan | | | Target | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18.93 | % |
| Growth | | | Maximum | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22.72 | % |
| | | | Actual | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14.19 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Threshold | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.60 | % |
| Asset | | | Target | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.00 | % |
| Quality | | | Maximum | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.40 | % |
| (30 Day +) | | | Actual | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.14 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Threshold | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.33 | % |
| Net | | | Target | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.41 | % |
| Charge- | | | Maximum | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.49 | % |
| offs | | | Actual | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.37 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Threshold | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.50 | % |
| Total Loan | | | Target | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3.12 | % |
| Spread | | | Maximum | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3.74 | % |
| | | | Actual | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3.15 | % |
| · | 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (“2011 EIP”).Threshold performance measures must be met before the Committee considers making an award under the 2011 EIP. Potential award amounts for each of the named executive officers equal 80% of the respective target award for performance at threshold, 100% of the respective target award for performance at target, and 150% or 125% for tiers 1 and 2 respectively, of the respective target award for maximum performance. Messrs. Smith and Norman L. Lowery are tier 1 participants; whereas Messrs. McHargue, Clary and Norman D. Lowery are tier 2 participants. The Committee spends a significant amount of time analyzing financial measures and determining the level of performance required to receive threshold, target and maximum annual incentive payouts. The Committee established the performance measures in amounts which it believes to be achievable given a sustained effort on the part of the named executive officers and which require increasingly greater effort to achieve the target and maximum objectives. |
For awards made for 2012 performance period, the performance measures were weighted as follows for each of the named executive officers, based on the Committee’s assessment of what is important to the Corporation’s and the Bank’s overall performance and within the scope of control of the respective executive officers:
3 Year Average NetIncome | 3 Year Average Return onAssets | 3 Year Average Return onEquity | 3 Year Average EPSGrowth Rate |
| 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
Performance measures are compared to goal and weighted accordingly. The goals for each of the named executive officers at the various performance levels as well as the actual performance levels are listed in the table below. Donald E. Smith’s goals are based on the performance of First Financial Corporation. Messrs N.L. Lowery, McHargue, N.D. Lowery, and Clary’s goals are based on the performance of First Financial Bank except for Three Year average Earnings Per Share growth which is based on the performance of First Financial Corporation.
| Measure | | Level | | Smith | | | NLLowery | | | McHargue | | | NDLowery | | | Clary | |
| 3 Year | | Threshold | | $ | 25,904 | | | $ | 23,134 | | | $ | 23,134 | | | $ | 23,134 | | | $ | 23,134 | |
| Average | | Target | | $ | 32,380 | | | $ | 28,917 | | | $ | 28,917 | | | $ | 28,917 | | | $ | 28,917 | |
| Net Income | | Maximum | | $ | 48,570 | | | $ | 43,376 | | | $ | 36,146 | | | $ | 36,146 | | | $ | 36,146 | |
| | | Actual | | $ | 32,684 | | | $ | 30,388 | | | $ | 30,388 | | | $ | 30,388 | | | $ | 30,388 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 Year | | Threshold | | | 0.92 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.90 | % |
| Average | | Target | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.13 | % |
| Return on | | Maximum | | | 1.73 | % | | | 1.70 | % | | | 1.41 | % | | | 1.41 | % | | | 1.41 | % |
| Assets | | Actual | | | 1.24 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.20 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 Year | | Threshold | | | 7.38 | % | | | 7.56 | % | | | 7.56 | % | | | 7.56 | % | | | 7.56 | % |
| Average | | Target | | | 9.22 | % | | | 9.45 | % | | | 9.45 | % | | | 9.45 | % | | | 9.45 | % |
| Return on | | Maximum | | | 13.83 | % | | | 14.18 | % | | | 11.81 | % | | | 11.81 | % | | | 11.81 | % |
| Equity | | Actual | | | 9.57 | % | | | 9.62 | % | | | 9.62 | % | | | 9.62 | % | | | 9.62 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 Year Avg | | Threshold | | | 6.03 | % | | | 6.03 | % | | | 6.03 | % | | | 6.03 | % | | | 6.03 | % |
| Earnings | | Target | | | 7.54 | % | | | 7.54 | % | | | 7.54 | % | | | 7.54 | % | | | 7.54 | % |
| Per Share | | Maximum | | | 11.31 | % | | | 11.31 | % | | | 9.43 | % | | | 9.43 | % | | | 9.43 | % |
| Growth | | Actual | | | 14.41 | % | | | 14.41 | % | | | 14.41 | % | | | 14.41 | % | | | 14.41 | % |
In February 2013, the Committee determined to make awards of restricted stock based on the Corporation’s performance against the 2012 performance measures discussed above. Because these awards of restricted stock were granted in 2013, they are not reflected in the 2012 Summary Compensation or Grants of Plan Based Awards Tables but will be included in the tables in 2013.
The Committee met in February 2013 and determined the above performance measures in aggregate had been met at the maximum level of performance for Messrs. McHargue, N. D. Lowery, and Clary, and at the target level for Messrs. Smith and N. L. Lowery. As a result, restricted stock awards were granted to the following executive officers on February 5, 2013 subject to becoming vested in one-third increments over a three-year period commencing on December 31, 2013, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The Committee determined the number of restricted shares subject to an award by dividing the dollar amount of the award calculated based on the achievement of the foregoing performance goals and dividing that amount by the mean between the highest and lowest quoted selling prices of the Corporation’s common stock as of the day the award is granted. Below is a table which identifies the calculation of the award of restricted stock to named executive officers. For 2009,The 2011 EIP does not permit issuance of fractional shares, so, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 EIP, the number of restricted shares awarded was rounded down to the nearest whole number.
| Name | | Dollar Amountof Award | | | Stock Price onFebruary 5, 2013 | | | Number of Shares ofRestricted Stock Awarded | |
| Donald E. Smith | | $ | 151,188.83 | | | $ | 30.55 | | | | 4,948 | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | $ | 459,532.09 | | | $ | 30.55 | | | | 15,041 | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | $ | 94,913.00 | | | $ | 30.55 | | | | 3,106 | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | $ | 93,745.00 | | | $ | 30.55 | | | | 3,068 | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | $ | 92,815.50 | | | $ | 30.55 | | | | 3,038 | |
Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines and Prohibition on Hedging
Share ownership and retention guidelines help to foster a focus on long-term growth. The Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines applicable to our named executive officers. Our named executive officers are required to own a number of shares of the Corporation’s common stock equal in value to $500,000 for Messrs. Smith and Norman L. Lowery, and $150,000 for all other named executive officers. Except for purposes of exercising statutory diversification rights under the ESOP, covered employees may not dispose of shares until they have satisfied the guidelines. Covered employees are expected to comply with the guidelines as soon as practicable and in no event later than five years after the date they become a covered employee. In the case of individuals who were covered employees when the guidelines became effective, compliance is required within five years of the effective date. Messrs. Donald E. Smith, Norman L. Lowery, and Norman D. Lowery currently meet these requirements.
The named executive officers are prohibited from engaging in hedging or monetization transactions with respect to the securities of the Corporation.
Tax Deductibility Cap on Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1 million paid to each of a company’s chief executive officer and certain other highly compensated executive officers. Qualifying performance-based compensation will not be subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements are met. It is the Committee’s objective to maximize deductibility under Section 162(m) to the extent consistent with the Committee’s assessment of the interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Executive Compensation Recovery Policy
We can recover or “claw back” all or a portion of an incentive compensation payment which was based on erroneous data due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under securities laws which resulted in an accounting restatement. The claw back will apply to incentive compensation described above which was paid within three years preceding the date of the accounting restatement. In that instance, the participant is required to repay the excess amount which would not have been paid to the participant but for the accounting restatement.
Results of Say-on-Pay Vote at 2012 Annual Meeting
At the Corporation’s 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, the Corporation held a nonbinding advisory vote on our named executive officer compensation (commonly referred to as “Say-on-Pay”). At the meeting, approximately 81% of the represented shares voted to approve the Corporation’s executive compensation programs, approximately 5% voted against, less than 1% abstained from voting and approximately 14% constituted broker non-votes.
The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee has considered the results of the vote and feedback received from shareholders as part of its review of the Corporation’s overall executive compensation program, including the appropriateness of the compensation philosophy and objectives, the role of the Committee and executive officers in setting compensation, the elements used to achieve the compensation philosophy and objectives and the levels of compensation provided to the named executive officers. Based upon an analysis of these factors, are weighted as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Bank Net | | | Contribution to | | | Branch Average | | | Average | | | | |
| | | Income | | | Income | | | Loans | | | Deposits | | | Discretionary | |
| Donald E. Smith | | | 100 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
| Norman L. Lowery | | | 100 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
| Michael A. Carty | | | 100 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
| Richard O. White | | | 20 | % | | | 10 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 30 | % |
| Thomas Clary | | | 25 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 0 | % | | | 25 | % |
Points arethe Committee determined the Corporation’s executive compensation philosophy and the application of this philosophy is appropriate.Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of the Corporation has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Committee (i) is satisfied that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis represents the philosophy, intent and actions of the Committee with regard to executive compensation, and (ii) recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A.
| Members of the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee: |
| Anton H. George, Chairman |
| Ronald K. Rich |
| William J. Voges |
| |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
2012 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | | Salary ($) | | | ($) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
(2)
($) | | | Change in
Pension Value
And Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation Earnings (3)
($) | | | All Other Compensation (4)
($) | | | Total
($) | |
| Donald E. Smith, | | | 2012 | | | | 200,000 | | | | 638,938 | | | | 91,137 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 930,075 | |
| Chairman of the Board | | | 2011 | | | | 712,129 | | | | — | | | | 419,685 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,131,814 | |
| and President | | | 2010 | | | | 697,801 | | | | — | | | | 727,991 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,425,792 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman L. Lowery, | | | 2012 | | | | 607,615 | (5) | | | 531,563 | | | | 275,845 | | | | 658,135 | | | | 85,538 | (7) | | | 2,158,696 | |
| Vice Chairman of the Board | | | 2011 | | | | 598,049 | | | | — | | | | 337,276 | | | | 976,461 | | | | 48,938 | | | | 1,960,724 | |
| and Chief Executive Officer | | | 2010 | | | | 583,890 | | | | — | | | | 600,444 | | | | 203,171 | | | | 34,325 | | | | 1,421,830 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rodger A. McHargue, | | | 2012 | | | | 189,826 | (5) | | | 92,306 | | | | 65,004 | | | | 148,717 | | | | 6,992 | (7) | | | 502,845 | |
| Chief Financial Officer, | | | 2011 | | | | 184,612 | | | | — | | | | 77,537 | | | | 154,452 | | | | 3,477 | | | | 420,078 | |
| First Financial Bank, N.A. and | | | 2010 | | | | 163,425 | | | | — | | | | 119,769 | | | | 15,714 | | | | 3,477 | | | | 302,385 | |
| First Financial Corporation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Thomas S. Clary, | | | 2012 | | | | 187,690 | (6) | | | 91,103 | | | | 61,813 | | | | 125,434 | | | | 5,795 | | | | 471,835 | |
| Chief Credit Officer, | | | 2011 | | | | 185,492 | | | | — | | | | 58,495 | | | | 152,386 | | | | 3,174 | | | | 399,547 | |
| First Financial Bank, N.A. | | | 2010 | | | | 180,684 | | | | — | | | | 129,408 | | | | 57,559 | | | | 5,198 | | | | 372,849 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman D. Lowery, | | | 2012 | | | | 185,631 | | | | 90,466 | | | | 63,568 | | | | 115,998 | | | | 11,309 | (7) | | | 466,972 | |
| Chief Operations Officer, | | | 2011 | | | | 180,937 | | | | — | | | | 75,991 | | | | 90,414 | | | | 7,385 | | | | 354,727 | |
| First Financial Bank, N.A. and | | | 2010 | | | | 173,389 | | | | — | | | | 121,735 | | | | 1,499 | | | | 7,296 | | | | 303,919 | |
| First Financial Corporation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | The amounts in this columnrepresent the aggregate grant date fair values of the restricted stock awarded in 2012, for 2011 performance, determined pursuant to FASB Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect whether the recipient will realize a financial benefit from the awards (such as becoming vested over the three-year graded vesting period). The grant date fair values have been determined based on the assumptions and methodologies set forth in the Corporation’s 2012 Form 10-K (note 16). |
| (2) | The amounts in this column reflect amounts earned under the 2011 STIP on December 31, 2012 which will be paid within 75 days of the end of the performance period provided the employee is employed on the date the award is paid. The 2011 STIP is discussed in detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement. |
| (3) | The amounts in this column reflect the actuarial increase in the present value of the named executive officers’ benefits under the Pension Plan determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Corporation’s financial statements and includes amounts which the named executive officer may not be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested. Because the ESOP and the Pension Plan constitute a “floor offset” retirement program, this column represents amounts that are required to be paid under the Pension Plan because they are not offset by the named executive officer’s ESOP benefit. |
| (4) | Allocations to the named executive officer’s respective account in the ESOP for 2012, which are properly included in this column, were not calculable as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Such amounts for 2011 were as follows: $13,203 for Mr. Smith; $13,203 for Mr. Norman L. Lowery; $12,877 for Mr. McHargue; $13,203for Mr. Clary; and $13,197 for Mr. Norman D. Lowery. |
| (5) | Includes $4,800 for service as a director of Portfolio Management Specialist A (a subsidiary of the Bank), Portfolio Management Specialist B (an indirect subsidiary of the Bank) and Global Portfolio Limited Partnership (an indirect subsidiary of the Bank). |
| (6) | Includes $200 for service as a manager of First Financial Real Estate LLP (a real estate investment trust of the bank). |
| (7) | Includes (i) the premiums paid by the Corporation pursuant to a life insurance program for named executive officers, (ii) amounts contributed by the Corporation under the 2005 EDC, which were $73,127 for Norman L. Lowery, $3,515 for Mr. McHargue, $2,051 for Mr. Clary, and $3,876 for Norman D. Lowery, and (iii) dividends on restricted stock. |
The following table sets forth the plan-based grants during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, consisting of awards made under the 2011 STIP and 2011 EIP, which is discussed in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR 2012
| Name | | Grant Date | | Plan Name | | Estimated Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards ($) (1) | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards ($) (2) | | | Grant Date Fair Value ($) (3) | |
| Donald E. Smith | | | | 2011 STIP | | | 91,137 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/5/2013 | | 2011 EIP | | | | | | | 151,189 | | | | 30.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | | | 2011 STIP | | | 275,845 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/5/2013 | | 2011 EIP | | | | | | | 459,532 | | | | 30.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | | | 2011 STIP | | | 65,004 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/5/2013 | | 2011 EIP | | | | | | | 94,913 | | | | 30.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | | | 2011 STIP | | | 61,813 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/5/2013 | | 2011 EIP | | | | | | | 93,745 | | | | 30.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | | | 2011 STIP | | | 63,568 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/5/2013 | | 2011 EIP | | | | | | | 92,815 | | | | 30.55 | |
___________________
| (1) | The amounts in this column represent the fiscal year 2012 awards under the 2011 STIP.To receive a payout under the 2011 STIP, a participant must remain employed with the Corporation through the date payment is made, which is within 75 days of the end of the performance period (except in the case of death, disability, retirement, termination without cause or a termination for good reason, which terms are defined in the 2011 STIP). |
| (2) | The awards in this column represent performance-based restricted stock awards made in 2013 based on performance during 2012.For the fiscal year 2012, the shares vest in three substantially equal installments on December 31 of 2013, 2014 and 2015. Vesting is contingent upon the executive officers remaining employed during the required service period. Award recipients are entitled to dividends on the restricted shares during the vesting period. |
| (3) | The fair market value of the performance-based restricted stock awards reported in this column is the grant date value of the awards as determined under FASB Topic 718. |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
| | | Stock Awards | |
| Name | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (1) (#) | | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) | |
| Donald E. Smith | | | 11,550 | | | | 349,272 | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | | 9,609 | | | | 290,576 | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | | 1,668 | | | | 50,440 | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | | 1,647 | | | | 49,805 | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | | 1,635 | | | | 49,442 | |
_______________
| (1) | This award represents performance-based restricted stock which was awarded on February 3, 2012 as earned based on performance during 2011. The restricted shares will vest on December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014 provided the executive is still employed on such date. |
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2012
| | | Stock Awards | |
| Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | | | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | |
| Donald E. Smith | | | 5,774 | | | | 174,606 | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | | 4,804 | | | | 145,273 | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | | 834 | | | | 25,220 | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | | 823 | | | | 24,888 | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | | 817 | | | | 24,706 | |
The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the named executive officers, based upon their achievementincluding the number of certain predefined target levelsyears of performance with respectservice credited to each of the factors. The point opportunities for Donald E. Smith, Norman L. Lowery, and Michael A. Carty for 2009 were as follows ($ amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Points Awarded for Achievement | |
| | | | | | | O Points | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 Points | |
| | | 2009 | | | (If Less | | | 1 Point | | | 2 Points | | | (If Greater | |
| Factors | | Target | | | Than) | | | (If Between) | | | (If Between) | | | Than) | |
| Bank Net Income | | $ | 22,985 | | | $ | 18,387 | | | $ | 18,388 | | | $ | 22,984 | | | $ | 22,985 | | | $ | 27,581 | | | $ | 27,582 | |
16
The point opportunities for Richard White for 2009 are as follows ($ amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Points Awarded for Achievement | |
| | | | | | | O Points | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 Points | |
| | | 2009 | | | (If Less | | | 1 Point | | | 2 Points | | | (If Greater | |
| Factors | | Target | | | Than) | | | (If Between) | | | (If Between) | | | Than) | |
| Bank Net Income | | $ | 22,985 | | | $ | 18,387 | | | $ | 18,388 | | | $ | 22,984 | | | $ | 22,985 | | | $ | 27,581 | | | $ | 27,582 | |
| Contribution to Income | | $ | 32,027 | | | $ | 25,621 | | | $ | 25,622 | | | $ | 32,026 | | | $ | 32,027 | | | $ | 38,431 | | | $ | 38,432 | |
| Branch Average Loans | | $ | 75,693 | | | $ | 60,553 | | | $ | 60,554 | | | $ | 75,691 | | | $ | 75,692 | | | $ | 90,831 | | | $ | 90,832 | |
| Average Deposits | | $ | 1,538,303 | | | $ | 1,230,641 | | | $ | 1,230,642 | | | $ | 1,538,287 | | | $ | 1,538,288 | | | $ | 1,845,961 | | | $ | 1,845,962 | |
The point opportunities for Thomas Clary for 2009 are as follows ($ amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Points Awarded for Achievement | |
| | | | | | | O Points | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 Points | |
| | | 2009 | | | (If Less | | | 1 Point | | | 2 Points | | | (If Greater | |
| Factors | | Target | | | Than) | | | (If Between) | | | (If Between) | | | Than) | |
| Bank Net Income | | $ | 22,985 | | | $ | 18,387 | | | $ | 18,388 | | | $ | 22,984 | | | $ | 22,985 | | | $ | 27,581 | | | $ | 27,582 | |
| Contribution to Income | | $ | 10,121 | | | $ | 8,096 | | | $ | 8,097 | | | $ | 10,120 | | | $ | 10,121 | | | $ | 12,144 | | | $ | 12,145 | |
| Branch Average Loans | | $ | 830,382 | | | $ | 664,305 | | | $ | 664,306 | | | $ | 830,373 | | | $ | 830,374 | | | $ | 996,457 | | | $ | 996,458 | |
Actual award amounts are based upon weighted point totals. Anysuch named executive officer, that earns between one point and two points will be deemed to have achieved the threshold level of performance and will receive an award at the 90% level. Named executive officers who earn between two points and three points will be deemed to have achieved the target level of performance and will receive an award at the 100% level. Officers who earn three points or more will be deemed to have achieved the superior level of performance and will receive an award at the 110% level. Any named executive officer who fails to earn at least one point will be deemed to have not achieved the threshold level of performance and will not be entitle to receive an award unless, the Compensation Committee determines, in its discretion that the circumstances warrant. The Committee did not exercise its discretion in this regard in 2009.
17
Payments under the 2001 and 2005 Plans generally do not begin until the earlier of January 1, 2015, or the January 1 immediately following the year in which the participant reaches age 65. Payment may also be made upon death, disability, and change in control or termination for other than cause. Mr. Smith’s payout will not begin until the earlier of January 1, 2010 or death, disability, or change in control or termination for other than cause. If a participant is a “key employee” as defined by Code Section 409A, which Mr. Smith is, then payments will be suspended for the six-month period following the participant’s separation from service. Payments are in cash only and are generally made in 180 equal consecutive monthly installments.
The Plan terminated on December 31, 2009 according to the stated term.
Life Insurance.As an incentive for executive officers to remain with the Corporation and the Bank, the Corporation also provides a life insurance program (the “Life Insurance Program”) for the named executive officers of the Bank other than Mr. Smith. Under the Life Insurance Program, the Bank purchased a life insurance policy on behalf of and pays the premiums on behalf of each executive officer of the Bank. The policy is owned by the individual and is intended to be fully paid at age 65 for those who were 55 or older, and at age 60 for those who were less than 55 years of age at the time the individual joined the Bank.
Employee Benefit Plans
401(k) Savings Plan.The First Financial Corporation Employees’ 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”) is a qualified salary reduction plan within the meaning of Code Section 401(k) available to substantially all of the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Under the Savings Plan all eligible employees may elect to have a portion of their compensation deferred and contributed to their individual accounts within the Savings Plan Trust. Subject to limits established under the Internal Revenue Code, contributions may be directed in any whole percentage between 1% and 50% of the employee’s base compensation and certain variable pay including overtime pay, bonuses, commissions, but excluding welfare benefits, deferred compensation, reimbursements and expense allowances. Amounts contributed to a participant’s individual account in the Savings Plan may be invested, at the direction of the Savings Plan participant, in certain investment fund choices made available for that purpose.
Retirement Plans.The Corporation sponsors the First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”) and the First Financial Corporation Employees’ Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”) for the benefit of substantially all of the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. These plans together constitute a “floor offset” retirement program, so that the Pension Plan provides each participant with a minimum benefit which is offset by the benefit provided by the ESOP.
Under the terms of the ESOP, the Corporation or its subsidiaries, as participating employers, may contribute Corporation common stock to the ESOP or contribute cash to the ESOP, which will be primarily invested by the Bank, as the ESOP trustee, in the Corporation’s common stock. The amount of contributions, when they are made, is determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. No participant contributions are required or allowed under the ESOP. Participants have the right to direct the voting of the shares of the Corporation’s stock allocated to their accounts under the ESOP on all corporate matters. Participants may elect to receive a direct payment of dividends paid on shares of the Corporation’s common stock allocated to their accounts or to have the dividends reinvested in Corporation common stock within the ESOP. Upon completing ten years of participation in the ESOP and attaining age 55 1/2, an ESOP participant may elect to diversify over a six-year period up to 50% of the Corporation’s common stock allocated to the participant’s ESOP account.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation contributed 35,000 shares of the Corporation’s stock valued at $971,250 to the ESOP. The stock will be allocated to the individual ESOP accounts of the participants who are eligible to receive allocations of those contributions, effective as of December 31, 2009, although the allocation to the individual accounts had not been made or calculated as of the date of mailing of this Proxy Statement.
18
Defined Benefit Plan.The Pension Plan is a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by the Corporation for the benefit of substantially all of the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The monthly guaranteed minimum benefit under the Pension Plan is reduced by the monthly benefit derived from the vested portion of the participant’s ESOP account balance, calculated by the actuary for the Pension Plan as a single life annuity. Unless the participant elects an alternate form of benefit under the Pension Plan, the
normal retirement benefit, if any,ESRP and the 2005 ESRP. The benefits were determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Corporation’s financial statements and are not payable
as a lump sum; they are generally paid as a monthly annuity for the life of the retiree.PENSION BENEFITS
| Name | | Plan Name | | Number of Years Credited Service | | | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) (1) | | | Payments During Last Fiscal Year | |
| Donald E. Smith | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 43 | | | | — | (2) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 16 | | | | 1,145,413 | (3) | | | — | |
| | | ESRP | | | 16 | | | | 797,147 | (4) | | | — | |
| | | 2005 ESRP | | | 16 | | | | 1,651,234 | (4) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 17 | | | | 364,357 | (3) | | | — | |
| | | 2005 ESRP | | | 17 | | | | 7,013 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 10 | | | | 530,761 | (3)(5) | | | — | |
| | | 2005 ESRP | | | 10 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 20 | | | | 214,900 | (3) | | | — | |
| | | 2005 ESRP | | | 20 | | | | 2,498 | | | | — | |
| (1) | The calculation of present value of accumulated benefit assumes a discount rate of 4.05% and mortality based on the 2012 IRS Current Liability Tables. Benefits are not payable as a lump sum; they are generally paid as a monthly annuity for the life of the retiree. |
| (2) | Mr. Smith is not entitled to a benefit from the Pension Plan because the value of his ESOP benefit exceeds the value of his Pension Plan benefit pursuant to the floor offset arrangement. |
| (3) | These amounts represent the amount that Messrs. Norman L. Lowery, McHargue, Clary and Norman D. Lowery’s Pension Plan benefit exceeds their ESOP benefit pursuant to the floor offset arrangement. |
| (4) | This amount represents the amount Mr. Norman L. Lowery’s Executive Supplemental Retirement benefit exceeds his Executive Deferred Compensation benefit. |
| (5) | Because Mr. Clary was over 55 years of age and had more than five years of service as of December 31, 2012, he would have qualified for early retirement benefits equal to approximately 73%, of his full retirement benefit if he had retired at December 31, 2012. |
The benefits provided under the Pension Plan will begin atare offset by the later of the participant’s retirement or age 65 and be paid monthly for as long as the participant lives. Messrs. Lowery, Carty, Clary and White, having surpassed their 55th birthday and served the Corporation for more than 5 years, are eligible for early retirementbenefits provided under the Pension Plan.ESOP. The Pension Plan allows for an early retirement benefit equal to a participant’s accrued benefit, determined before the reduction for the monthly ESOP benefit, reduced by 1/180 for each full month for the first five years and 1/360 for each full month for the next five years that the commencement of benefit payments precedes the participant’s normal retirement date.
The following table shows the estimated annual benefits payable under the Pension Plan upon retirement at age 65 in 2009 for various periods of Benefit Service at specified levels of remuneration. A participant’s Final Average Annual Compensation shown under the Pension Plan is generally based on the salary and bonus set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
Final Average Annual Compensation(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Benefit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service | | $70,000 | | | $100,000 | | | $130,000 | | | $160,000 | | | $190,000 | | | $220,000 | | | $250,000 | | | $300,000 | |
| 10 | | | 14,455 | | | | 22,405 | | | | 30,355 | | | | 38,305 | | | | 46,255 | | | | 54,205 | | | | 62,155 | | | | 75,405 | |
| 20 | | | 28,910 | | | | 44,810 | | | | 60,710 | | | | 76,610 | | | | 92,510 | | | | 108,410 | | | | 124,310 | | | | 150,810 | |
| 30 | | | 36,365 | | | | 57,215 | | | | 78,065 | | | | 98,915 | | | | 119,765 | | | | 140,615 | | | | 161,465 | | | | 196,215 | |
| 40 | | | 36,593 | | | | 58,418 | | | | 80,243 | | | | 102,068 | | | | 123,893 | | | | 145,718 | | | | 167,543 | | | | 203,918 | |
| | |
(1) | | The amounts indicated in the chart will be offset by any ESOP benefit the participant has. If the ESOP benefit is greater than the Pension Plan benefit, then no benefit will be paid by the Pension Plan. To the extent the Pension Plan benefit exceeds the ESOP benefit, such excess will be paid by the Pension Plan. |
Explanation of ESOP/Pension Plan Offset Arrangement.The offset between the ESOP and the Pension Plan works in the following manner. If a participant’s ESOP benefit exceeds the benefit he has accrued under the Pension Plan, the participant will receive his ESOP benefit in lieu of the Pension Plan benefit. For example, a participant’s ESOP benefit is $120,000 and his Pension Plan benefit is $100,000. The $120,000 benefit will be paid from the ESOP and $0 will be paid from the Pension Plan. However, if a participant’s Pension Plan benefit exceeds his ESOP benefit, then the participant will receive his ESOP benefit along with the amount the Pension Plan benefit exceeded the ESOP benefit paid from the Pension Plan. For example, a participant’s ESOP benefit is $100,000 and his Pension benefit is $120,000. The $100,000 benefit will be paid from the ESOP and $20,000 will be paid from the Pension Plan.
Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan.The First Financial Corporation Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “ESRP”) provides supplemental retirement benefits for a select group of management or highly compensated employees to help recompense the employees for benefits reduced due to the imposition of Code limitations on benefitsprovided under the Pension Plan. Amounts payable under theESRP and 2005 ESRP are offset by amounts payable under the First Financial Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan. The ESRP was frozen effective December 31, 2004 to exempt all amounts under the ESRP from Code Section 409A. The Board adopted The First Financial Corporation 2005 Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “2005 ESRP”) as a replacement plan, effective January 1, 2005. The 2005 ESRP is designed to comply with Code Section 409A. Amounts payable under the ESRP will be offset by amounts payable under the First Financial Corporation Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan and amounts payable under the 2005 ESRP will be offset by amounts payable under the First Financial Corporation 2005 Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan.
19
Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan.The First Financial Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “EDC Plan”) permits a select group of management or highly compensated employees to elect to defer compensation from the employers, in addition to that which can be deferred under the Savings Plan, without regard to the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code on the amount of compensation which may be deferred. The EDC Plan also provides for a supplemental ESOP benefit which is equal to the amount of the benefit a participant would have been allocated under the ESOP if not for the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code on the ESOP. Amounts payable under the supplemental ESOP portion of the EDC Plan will offset amounts payable under the ESRP. The EDC Plan was frozen effective December 31, 2004 to exempt all amounts accruedbenefits provided under the EDC from Code Section 409A. The Board adopted the First Financial Corporation 2005 Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2005 EDC Plan”) as a replacement plan, effective January 1, 2005. The 2005 EDC Plan is designed to comply with Code Section 409A. Amounts payable underand the 2005 EDC Plan willrespectively. The offset amounts payable underworks in the 2005 ESRP.
Explanation of ESRP/EDC Arrangement.following manner. The offset between the ESRP and the EDC works just likein the same manner as the ESOP/Pension Plan offset. If a participant’s EDC benefit exceeds the benefit he has accrued under the ESRP, the participant will receive his EDC benefit in lieu of the ESRP benefit. For example, a participant’s EDC benefit is $120,000 and his ESRP benefit is $100,000. The $120,000 benefit will be paid from the EDC and $0 will be paid from the ESRP. However, if a participant’s ESRP benefit exceeds his EDC benefit, then the participant will receive his EDC benefit along with the amount the ESRP benefit exceeded the EDC benefit paid from the ESRP. For example, a participant’s EDC benefit is $100,000 and his ESRP is $120,000. The $100,000 benefit will be paid from the EDC and $20,000 will be paid from the ESRP.
Employment Agreement
The Bank agreed to enter into an Employment Agreement with Norman L. Lowery, its President and Chief Executive Officer, upon the beginning of Mr. Lowery’s employment in January 1996. The Employment Agreement was finalized and became effective in 1997. It has been extended each year since that time, and was last extended effective January 1, 2010. The Employment Agreement is a five-year agreement which may be extended on each anniversary by the Board of Directors of the Bank for an additional one-year term. During the period of his employment, the Employment Agreement requires that Mr. Lowery devote all of his full business time, attention, skill and efforts to the faithful performance of his duties. He has also agreed to the following nonsolicitation, noncompetition and nondisclosure provisions:
Nonsolicitation.For a one year period after termination for any reason or the expiration of the term, Mr. Lowery will not: (i) solicit any non-legal business of any party which is a customer of the Bank at the time of such termination or during the one-year period immediately preceding such termination, (ii) request or advise any customers or suppliers of the Bank to terminate, reduce, limit or change their business or relationship with the Bank, or (iii) induce, request or attempt to influence any employee of the Bank to terminate his employment with the Bank.
Noncompetition.In the event Mr. Lowery voluntarily terminates his employment with the Bank, he will not during the period of his employment, and for a period of two years following termination: (i) engage in the same trade or business as the Bank which would conflict with the interests of the Bank or in a trade or business competitive with that of the Bank; or (ii) offer or provide employment to any person who then currently is, or who within one year prior to such offer has been, a management-level employee of the Bank.
Nondisclosure.Mr. Lowery will not, directly or indirectly, use any “confidential information” (as defined in the agreement) for any purpose other than for the benefit of the Bank provide any confidential information except as required in the normal course of his service as a consultant or employee of the Bank during the term of the agreement and following termination of the agreement until either (i) such confidential information becomes obsolete; or (ii) such confidential information becomes generally known in the Bank’s trade or industry by means other than a breach of this covenant.
20
Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Lowery receives an annual salary equal to his current salary, which is $500,074 for 2010, subject to increases or decreases approved by the Board of Directors, and is entitled to participate in other bonus and fringe benefit plans available to the Corporation’s and the Bank’s employees. Additional information regarding the terms of the Employment Agreement is included in the narrative discussion under “Potential Payment Upon Termination or Change in Control of the Corporation” on page 27.
Accounting and Tax Considerations
We have structured our compensation program to comply with Internal Revenue Code Sections 162(m) and 409A. Under Code Section 162(m), a limitation was placed on tax deductions of any publicly-held corporation for individual compensation to certain executives of such corporation exceeding $1,000,000 in any taxable year, unless the compensation is performance-based. The Company has no individuals with non-performance based compensation paid in excess of the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) tax deduction limit. If an executive is entitled to nonqualified deferred compensation benefits that are subject to Section 409A, and such benefits do not comply with Section 409A, then the benefits are taxable in the first year they are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. In such case, the executive is subject to payment of regular federal income tax, interest and an additional federal income tax of 20% of the benefit includible in income.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee of the Corporation has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A.
| | | | |
| | Members of the Compensation Committee | | |
| | | | |
| | /s/ Anton H. George | | |
| | /s/ Ronald K. Rich | | |
| | /s/ William J. Voges | | |
21
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth information concerning total compensation earned or paid to our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our three most highly compensated executive officers who served in such capacities as of December 31, 2009, each of which had total annual compensation exceeding $100,000 in 2009 or in either of the preceding two years (the “named executive officers”), for services rendered to the Corporation during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change in Pension | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Value and | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Non-Equity | | | Nonqualified | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Incentive | | | Deferred | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Plan | | | Compensation | | | All Other | | | | |
| Name, Age and | | | | | | Salary | | | Bonus | | | Compensation | | | Earnings | | | Compensation | | | Total | |
| Principal Position | | Year | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | |
| (a) | | (b) | | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (g) (1) | | | (h) (2) | | | (i) (3) | | | (j) | |
| Donald E. Smith, | | | 2009 | | | $ | 640,590 | (4) | | $ | 160,000 | | | $ | 541,300 | | | | -0- | | | | -0- | (3) | | $ | 1,341,890 | (3) |
| Age 83 | | | 2008 | | | $ | 618,640 | | | $ | 160,000 | | | $ | 508,000 | | | | -0- | | | | -0- | | | $ | 1,286,640 | |
Chairman of the Board | | | 2007 | | | $ | 596,066 | | | $ | 160,000 | | | $ | 463,900 | | | | -0- | | | | -0- | | | $ | 1,219,966 | |
and President | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman L. Lowery, | | | 2009 | | | $ | 529,655 | (5) | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 451,000 | | | $ | 363,515 | | | $ | 32,144 | (3)(8) | | $ | 1,526,314 | (3) |
| Age 63, | | | 2008 | | | $ | 512,128 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 423,200 | | | $ | 145,385 | | | $ | 30,477 | | | $ | 1,261,190 | |
Vice Chairman and | | | 2007 | | | $ | 492,224 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 386,500 | | | $ | 246,478 | | | $ | 32,698 | | | $ | 1,307,900 | |
Chief Executive Officer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Michael A. Carty, | | | 2009 | | | $ | 201,863 | (6) | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | 107,000 | | | $ | 199,609 | | | $ | 1,200 | (3)(9) | | $ | 529,672 | |
| Age 59, | | | 2008 | | | $ | 194,948 | | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | 100,300 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,200 | | | $ | 316,448 | |
Chief Financial Officer | | | 2007 | | | $ | 188,284 | | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | 91,600 | | | $ | 184,180 | | | $ | 1,200 | | | $ | 485,264 | |
| Richard O. White, | | | 2009 | | | $ | 163,000 | | | $ | 12,000 | | | $ | 106,300 | | | $ | 250,484 | | | $ | 1,200 | (3)(9) | | $ | 532,984 | (3) |
| Age 62 | | | 2008 | | | $ | 157,630 | | | $ | 12,000 | | | $ | 99,700 | | | | -0- | | | $ | 1,200 | | | $ | 270,530 | |
Senior Vice President | | | 2007 | | | $ | 152,316 | | | $ | 12,000 | | | $ | 81,900 | | | $ | 209,064 | | | $ | 1,200 | | | $ | 456,480 | |
of First Financial Bank, N.A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Thomas S. Clary, | | | 2009 | | | $ | 178,629 | (7) | | $ | 17,000 | | | $ | 96,300 | | | $ | 49,442 | | | $ | 2,344 | (3)(9) | | $ | 343,715 | (3) |
| Age 58 | | | 2008 | | | $ | 173,040 | | | $ | 15,000 | | | $ | 81,720 | | | $ | 31,582 | | | $ | 2,344 | | | $ | 303,686 | |
Chief Credit Officer | | | 2007 | | | $ | 166,516 | | | $ | 15,000 | | | $ | 74,700 | | | $ | 28,108 | | | $ | 2,344 | | | $ | 286,668 | |
and Senior Vice President of First Financial Bank, N.A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | The amounts in column (g) reflect amounts awarded pursuant to the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, which is discussed in more detail on page 16 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. |
22
| | |
(2) | | The amounts in column (h) reflect the actuarial increase in the present value of the named executive officers’ benefits under the Pension Plan determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Corporation’s financial statements and includes amounts which the named executive officer may not be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested. Because the ESOP and the Pension Plan constitute a “floor offset” retirement program as described on page 20, this column represents amounts that are required to be paid under the Pension Plan because they are not offset by the executive’s ESOP benefit. |
|
(3) | | Allocations to the named individual’s respective account in the First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan for 2009, which are properly included in this column, were not calculable as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Such amounts for 2008 were as follows: $11,791 for Mr. Smith; $11,791 for Mr. Lowery; $10,835 for Mr. Carty; $9,176 for Mr. Clary; and $8,757 for Mr. White. |
|
(4) | | Includes $13,500 for service as a director of the Corporation and $18,500 for service as a director of the Bank. |
|
(5) | | Includes $7,500 for service as a director of the Corporation, $12,500 for service as a director of the Bank, $12,000 in deferred director fees and $4,800 for service as a director of Portfolio Management Specialist A (a subsidiary of the Bank), Portfolio Management Specialist B (an indirect subsidiary of the Bank) and Global Portfolio Limited Partnership (an indirect subsidiary of the Bank). |
|
(6) | | Includes $4,800 for service as a director of Portfolio Management Specialist A (a subsidiary of the Bank), Portfolio Management Specialist B (an indirect subsidiary of the Bank) and Global Portfolio Limited Partnership (an indirect subsidiary of the Bank). |
|
(7) | | Includes $4,800 for service as an advisory director to the Bank’s Sullivan region, $6,200 for service as a director of The Morris Plan Company of Terre Haute, Inc. (a subsidiary of the Corporation)and $200 for service as a manager of First Financial Real Estate LLP (a real estate investment trust of the bank). |
|
(8) | | Includes (a) the premiums paid by the Corporation pursuant to a life insurance program for named executive officers, and (b) $27,249 accrued under the Executive Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan, which is discussed in more detail on page 21 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. |
|
(9) | | Represents the premiums paid by the Corporation pursuant to a life insurance program for named executive officers. |
23
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth the plan-based grants made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to the Corporation’s 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is discussed in more detail on page 7 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under | |
| | | | | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) | |
| | | | | | | Threshold | | | Target | | | Superior | |
| Name | | Grant Date | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | |
| (a) | | (b) | | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | |
| Donald E. Smith | | | N/A | | | $ | 487,170 | | | $ | 541,300 | (2) | | $ | 595,430 | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | | N/A | | | $ | 405,900 | | | $ | 451,000 | (2) | | $ | 496,100 | |
| Michael A. Carty | | | N/A | | | $ | 96,300 | | | $ | 107,000 | (2) | | $ | 117,700 | |
| Richard O. White | | | N/A | | | $ | 95,670 | | | $ | 106,300 | (2) | | $ | 116,630 | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | | N/A | | | $ | 86,670 | | | $ | 96,300 | (2) | | $ | 105,930 | |
| | |
(1) | | Awards of compensation equal 90%, 100% or 110% of the individual’s award amount. The percentage of the award made is dependent upon whether the participant attains either the threshold, target or superior level of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee for the Corporation and Bank. If the first target level is not attained, no award is made. If the threshold, target or superior levels of the performance goals are attained, the award will equal 90%, 100% or 110% of the award amount, respectively. Awards for 2009 were based on weighted point totals related to goals established for the Corporation and the Bank and various product line performance. Goals include net income, product growth, contribution to income, and the attainment of agreed levels of controllable expenditures for the respective participants. |
|
(2) | | For the fiscal year 2009 Messrs. Smith, Lowery, Carty, White, and Clary achieved the “Target” level award, which amounts are included in the named executive officer’s compensation in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 23 of this Proxy Statement. |
24
Pension Benefits
The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the named executive officers, including the number of years of service credited to each such named executive officer, under the Corporation’s Qualified Pension Benefit Plan (the “Pension Plan”), the Corporation’s Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan which was frozen on December 31, 2004 (the “Frozen ESRP”), and the Corporation’s 2005 Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “2005 ESRP”). The benefits were determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Corporation’s financial statements and are not payable as a lump sum; they are generally paid as a monthly annuity for the life of the retiree. Information regarding these plans can be found on page 19 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Number of Years | | | Present Value of | | | Payments During | |
| | | | | Credited Service | | | Accumulated Benefit | | | Last Fiscal Year | |
| Name | | Plan Name | | (#) | | | ($) | | | ($) | |
| (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | | (d) (1) | | | (e) | |
| Donald E. Smith | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 41 | | | | 0 | (2) | | | 0 | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 14 | | | $ | 602,410 | (3)(5) | | | 0 | |
| | | Frozen and 2005 ESRP | | | 14 | | | $ | 1,154,419 | (4)(5) | | | | |
| Michael A. Carty | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 34 | | | $ | 376,038 | (3)(5) | | | 0 | |
| Richard O. White | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 41 | | | $ | 314,778 | (3)(5) | | | 0 | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | Qualified Pension Plan | | | 8 | | | $ | 195,382 | (3)(5) | | | 0 | |
| | |
(1) | | The calculation of present value of accumulated benefit assumes a discount rate of 5.96% and mortality based on the 2009 IRS Current Liability Tables. Benefits are not payable as a lump sum; they are generally paid as a monthly annuity for the life of the retiree. |
|
(2) | | Mr. Smith is not entitled to a benefit from the Pension Plan because the value of his ESOP benefit exceeds the value of his Pension Plan benefit pursuant to the floor offset arrangement discussed on page 19. |
|
(3) | | These amounts represent the amount that Messrs. Lowery, Carty, White and Clary’s Pension Plan benefit exceeds their ESOP benefit pursuant to the floor offset arrangement discussed on page 8. |
|
(4) | | This amount represents the amount Mr. Lowery’s Executive Supplemental Retirement benefit exceeds his Executive Deferred Compensation benefit. |
|
(5) | | As Messrs. Lowery, Carty, White and Clary were over 55 years of age and had more than five years of service as of December 31, 2007, they would have qualified for early retirement benefits equal to approximately 87%, 63%, 80% and 60%, respectively, of their full retirement benefit if they had retired at December 31, 2009. |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation For 2009
2012Pursuant to the Corporation’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which was frozen on December 31, 2004 (the “EDC”),EDC and the Corporation’s 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2005 EDC, Plan”), the Corporation permitswe permit certain managementexecutive officers and highly compensated employees to defer a portion of their compensation and also providesprovide supplemental benefits to certain highly compensated employees to recompense the employees for benefits lost due to the imposition of Code limitations in the ESOP. The amounts shown below represent the accumulated benefit cost to the Corporation for these plans.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Registrant | | | Aggregate | | | Aggregate | | | Aggregate Balance | |
| | | | | Executive | | | Contributions in | | | Earnings in Last | | | Withdrawals/ | | | at Last | |
| | | | | Contributions | | | Last FY | | | FY | | | Distributions | | | FYE | |
| Name | | | | in Last FY | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | |
| (a) | | Plan Name | | (b) | | | (c) (1) | | | (d) (2) | | | (e) | | | (f) (3) | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | Frozen and 2005 EDC Plan | | | 0 | | | $ | 27,249 | | | $ | 30,871 | | | | 0 | | | $ | 457,759 | |
| Richard O. White | | Frozen EDC Plan | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | $ | 14,881 | |
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
| Name | | Plan Name | | Executive Contributions in last Fiscal Year ($) | | | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) (1) | | | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) | | | Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions ($) | | | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($) | |
| Donald E. Smith | | 2001 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 90,529 | | | | 155,876 | | | | 1,270,479 | |
| | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 145,620 | | | | 250,733 | | | | 2,043,639 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | EDC | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,847 | | | | — | | | | 381,590 | |
| | | 2005 EDC | | | — | | | | 73,127 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 248,174 | |
| | | 2001 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 89,099 | | | | 140,227 | | | | 1,256,555 | |
| | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 142,323 | | | | 223,992 | | | | 2,007,150 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,552 | | | | — | | | | 219,887 | |
| | | 2005 EDC | | | — | | | | 3,515 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,678 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | 2001 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,081 | | | | — | | | | 177,067 | |
| | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,719 | | | | — | | | | 428,558 | |
| | | 2005 EDC | | | — | | | | 2,051 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,150 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | 2001 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,882 | | | | — | | | | 142,149 | |
| | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,552 | | | | — | | | | 219,887 | |
| | | 2005 EDC | | | — | | | | 3,876 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,057 | |
| | |
| (1) | | These amounts are included in the named executive officer’s compensation in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 23 of this Proxy Statement.Table. |
25
| | |
(2) | | These amounts include the aggregate earnings related to the employee’s contributions made over the years in the amounts of $30,781 and $0 for Messrs. Lowery and White respectively. |
|
(3) | | These amounts include the aggregate balance at the last fiscal year related to the employee’s contributions, earnings, and appreciation over the years in the amounts of $207,237 and $14,881 for Messrs. Lowery and White, respectively. |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control of the Corporation
Employment Agreement with Norman L. Lowery
The Corporation entered into a five-year employment agreement with Mr. Lowery in 1997. The employment agreement, which may be extended each year by the board of directors of the Bank for an additional one-year term was last extended for an additional one-year term in January 2010 Mr. Lowery must satisfy the terms of the agreement, including its nonsolicitation, noncompetition and nondisclosure provisions, to receive the following severance benefits, in addition to any benefits he is due under the Corporation’s qualified and nonqualified employee benefit plans:
| •· | Term: The Corporation and the Bank entered into a three-year employment agreement with Mr. Lowery effective December 1, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”). The Employment Agreement may be extended each year only by affirmative action of the Committee for an additional year. |
| · | Restrictive Covenants:Mr. Lowery must satisfy the terms of the Employment Agreement, including the nonsolicitation, noncompetition and nondisclosure provisions discussed below, to receive the severance benefits discussed below in addition to any benefits he is due under the Corporation’s qualified and nonqualified employee benefit plans. |
| o | Nonsolicitation. For a one-year period after termination for any reason or the expiration of the term, Mr. Lowery will not: (i) solicit any non-legal business of any party which is a customer of the Corporation at the time of such termination or during the one-year period immediately preceding such termination, (ii) request or advise any customers or suppliers of the Corporation to terminate, reduce, limit or change their business or relationship with the Corporation, or (iii) induce, request or attempt to influence any employee of the Bank to terminate his employment with the Corporation. |
| o | Noncompetition. In the event Mr. Lowery voluntarily terminates his employment with the Corporation or the Bank, he will not during the period of his employment, and for a one-year period following termination: (i) engage in the same trade or business as the Corporation which would conflict with the interests of the Corporation or in a trade or business competitive with that of the Corporation; or (ii) offer or provide employment to any person who then currently is, or who within one year prior to such offer has been, a management-level employee of the Corporation. |
| o | Nondisclosure Mr. Lowery will not, directly or indirectly, use any “confidential information” (as defined in the Employment Agreement) for any purpose other than for the benefit of the Corporation or communicate, deliver, exhibit or provide any confidential information except as required in the normal course of his service as a consultant or employee of the Corporation during the term of the Employment Agreement and following termination of the Employment Agreement until either (i) such confidential information becomes obsolete; or (ii) such confidential information becomes generally known in the Corporation’s trade or industry by means other than a breach of this covenant. |
| · | Termination For Cause, Death or Disability:If Mr. Lowery is terminated for “cause” (as defined below), death or disability, he is entitled to receive the base salary, bonuses, vested rights, and other benefits due him through his date of termination. Any benefits payable under insurance, health, retirement, bonus, incentive (including, but not limited to, the 2001 orLTIP and the 2005 Long Term Incentive Plans)LTIP), performance or other plans as a result of his participation in such plans through such date of termination will be paid when and as due under those plans. |
For purposes of the Employment Agreement, “cause” is defined as: (i) an intentional act of fraud, embezzlement, theft, or personal dishonesty; willful misconduct, or breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit by the Mr. Lowery in the course of his employment or director service; (ii) intentional wrongful damage by Mr. Lowery to the business or property of the Corporation; (iii) breach by Mr. Lowery of any confidentiality or non-disclosure obligation; (iv) gross negligence or insubordination in the performance of his duties; or (v) removal or permanent prohibition of Mr. Lowery from participating in the Bank’s affairs by order under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
|
| · | | For purposes of the agreement, “cause” is defined as: (i) an intentional act of fraud, embezzlement, theft, or personal dishonesty; willful misconduct, or breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit by the Mr. Lowery in the course of his employment or director service; (ii) intentional wrongful damage by Mr. Lowery to the business or property of the Bank; (iii) breach by Mr. Lowery of any confidentiality or non-disclosure obligation; (iv) gross negligence or insubordination in the performance of his duties; or (v) removal or permanent prohibition of Mr. Lowery from participating in the Bank’s affairs by order under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. |
|
| • | | Termination by Corporation Without Causeor by Employee For Good Reason:If Mr. Lowery is terminated without “cause” or if he terminates his employment for “good reason” (as defined below), and such termination does not occur in connection with, or within 12 months after a “change in control,”control” (as defined below), he will receive an amount equal to the sum of the following benefits as if he had terminated employment on December 31, 2009:2012 provided, in the event of a good reason termination, he gives proper notice of the circumstances giving rise to the termination which are not remedied by the Corporation or the Bank: (i) fourthree times his base salary and bonuses; (ii) the Corporation’s portion of the cost of obtaining health insurance for himself and his spouse and child living in his home for a period of fourthree years; (iii) the cost of obtaining disability insurance for a period of fourthree years; (iv)(v) the cost of obtaining life insurance for a period of fourthree years; (v)(vi) the cost of existing professional and club dues for a period of fourthree years, (vi)(vii) the cost of continuing legal education for a period of fourthree years; (vii)(viii) the cost of automobile benefits for a period of fourthree years; (viii) four(ix) three times the benefit accrued in 20092012 under the 2005 Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan; (ix) fourESRP; (x) three times the benefit accrued in 20092012 under the 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan; (x) fourEDC; (xi) three times the benefit accrued in 20092012 under the Employees’ Pension Plan; (xi) four(xii) three times the benefit accrued in 20092012 under the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The amounts provided in the prior sentence will be provided net of all income and payroll taxes that would not have been payable by Mr. Lowery had he continued participation in the benefit plan or program instead of receiving cash reimbursement. |
26
| · | | For purposes of the agreement, “good reason” means the occurrence of any of the following events, which has not been consented to in advance by Mr. Lowery in writing: (i) the requirement that Mr. Lowery move his personal residence; (ii) a reduction of ten percent or more in Mr. Lowery’s base salary, unless part of an institution-wide reduction and similar to the reduction in the base salary of all other executive officers of the Bank; (iii) the failure by the Bank to continue to provide Mr. Lowery with the base salary, bonuses or benefits provided for in the Employment Agreement, as the same may be increased from time to time, or with benefits substantially similar to those provided to him under those sections or under any benefit plan or program in which he now or hereafter becomes eligible to participate, or the taking of any action by the Bank which would directly or indirectly reduce any such benefits or deprive Mr. Lowery of any such benefit enjoyed by him, unless part of an institution-wide reduction and applied similarly to all other executive officers of the Bank; (v) the assignment to Mr. Lowery of duties and responsibilities materially different from those normally associated with his position; (vi) a failure to elect or re-elect Mr. Lowery to the Board of the Bank or a failure on the part of the Corporation to honor its obligation to nominate him to the Board of the Corporation; (vii) a material diminution or reduction in the Mr. Lowery’s responsibilities or authority (including reporting responsibilities) in connection with his employment with the Bank; or (viii) a material reduction in the secretarial or administrative support of Mr. Lowery. |
|
| • | | Termination due to Retirement:If Mr. Lowery voluntarily retires, at or after attaining age 65, he will receive full health, life and disability coverage for himself, his spouse and his children living in his home until both he and his spouse are eligible for Medicare. When both Mr. Lowery and his spouse are eligible for Medicare, the Bank agrees to pay for supplemental coverage until both his and his spouse’s death. He is also entitled to receive a life insurance policy on his life in the amount of $350,000 and a life insurance policy on his life in the amount established by the Bank’s insurance program for executive officers. |
|
| •· | | Termination Following Change in Control:If Mr. Lowery is terminated for other than “cause” or is constructively discharged and this occurs in connection with, or within 12 months following a “change in control” (as defined below) of the Bank or Corporation he would be entitled to an amount equal to the greater of the amount he would receive if he was terminated by the Corporation without cause; or, the product of 2.99 times the sum of (i) his base salary in effect as of the date of the change in control; (ii) an amount equal to the bonuses received by or payable to him in or for the calendar year prior to the year in which the change in control occurs; and (iii) cash reimbursements in an amount equal to his cost of obtaining, for a period of three years, beginning on the date of termination, all benefits which he was eligible to participate in or receive as of the date of termination. Mr. Lowery is also entitled to the payment provided for in this paragraph if a change in control occurs that was not approved by a majority of the Board regardless of whether his employment is terminated within 12 months. If, as a result of a change in control, Mr. Lowery becomes entitled to any payments which are determined to be payments subject to the Code Section 280G, the amount due Mr. Lowerythen his benefit will be increased to include payment equal to the amount of excise tax imposed under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code (the “Excise Tax Payment”) and the amount necessary to provide the Excise Tax Payment net of all income, payroll and excise taxes. |
|
| • | | Termination for Good Reason:If Mr. Lowery terminates employment following one of the events specified above under the definition of good reason (with the exception that reason (i) above is modified to state a requirement that he perform his principal executive functions more than 30 miles from Terre Haute, Indiana) within 12 months following a change in control of the Bank or the Corporation, he is entitled to an amount equal to the greater of (i)his benefit under the compensationagreement reduced to the maximum amount payable such that when it is aggregated with payments and benefits described above if he was terminated by the Corporation without cause; or, the product of 2.99 times the sum of (i) his base salary in effect as of the date of the change in control; (ii) an amount equal to the bonuses received by or payable to him in or for the calendar year prior to the year in which the change in control occurs;under all other plans and (iii) cash reimbursementsarrangements it will not result in an amount equal to his cost of obtaining for a period of three years, beginning on the date of termination, all benefits which he was eligible to participate in or receive. If, as a result of a change in control, Mr. Lowery becomes entitled to any payments which are determined to be payments subject to the“excess parachute payment” under Code Section 280G, or (ii) his benefit under the amount due Mr. Lowery will be increased to include payment equal toagreement after taking into account the amount of the excise tax imposed under SectionsCode Section 280G and 4999due to the benefit payment. Mr. Lowery is not entitled to any “gross up” payments under the terms of the Code and the amount necessary to provide the Excise Tax Payment net of all income, payroll and excise taxes.Employment Agreement. |
27
(i)Change in Ownership. Any person or group of persons acquires ownership of stock of the Bank or the Corporation that, together with stock held by the person or group, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock. However, if any person or group is considered to own more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock, the acquisition of additional stock by the same person or group is not considered to cause a change in the ownership of the Bank or the Corporation.
| | | For purposes of the agreement, “change in control” means: |
|
| | | (i) Change in Ownership.Any person, or group of persons acquires ownership of stock of the Bank or the Corporation that, together with stock held by the person or group, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock. However, if any person or group is considered to own more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock, the acquisition of additional stock by the same person or group is not considered to cause a change in the ownership of the Bank or the Corporation. |
|
| | | (ii) Change in the Effective Control.(a) Any person or group acquires, or has acquired during the twelve-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person(s), ownership of stock of the Bank or the Corporation possessing 35% or more of the total voting power; or (b) A majority of members of the Board is replaced during any twelve-month period by Directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Bank’s or the Corporation’s Board prior to the date of the appointment or election. |
|
| | | (iii) Change in the Ownership of a Substantial Portion of the Bank’s or First Financial Corporation’s Assets.Any person or group acquires, or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person(s), assets from the Bank or the Corporation that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets immediately prior to such acquisition(s). Gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the Bank or the Corporation, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets. However, there is no change in control when there is a transfer to an entity that is controlled by the shareholders of the Bank or the Corporation immediately after the transfer. |
|
| | | Notwithstanding the foregoing, the acquisition of Bank or the Corporation stock by any retirement plan sponsored by the Bank or an affiliate of the Bank will not constitute a change in control. |
(ii)Change in the Effective Control. (a) Any person or group acquires, or has acquired during the twelve-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person(s), ownership of stock of the Bank or the Corporation possessing 30% or more of the total voting power; or (b) a majority of members of the Board is replaced during any twelve-month period by Directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Bank’s or the Corporation’s Board prior to the date of the appointment or election.
(iii)Change in the Ownership of a Substantial Portion of the Bank’s or First Financial Corporation’s Assets.Any person or group acquires, or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person(s), assets from the Bank or the Corporation that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets immediately prior to such acquisition(s). Gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the Bank or the Corporation, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets. However, there is no change in control when there is a transfer to an entity that is controlled by the shareholders of the Bank or the Corporation immediately after the transfer.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the acquisition of Bank or the Corporation stock by any retirement plan sponsored by the Bank or an affiliate of the Bank will not constitute a change in control.
If Mr. Lowery qualifies as a “key employee” at the time of his separation from service, the Corporation may not make certain payments earlier than six months following the date of his separation from service (or, if earlier, the date of his death). In this event, payments to which Mr. Lowery would otherwise be entitled during the first six months following the date of his separation from service will be accumulated and paid to Mr. Lowery on the first day of the seventh month following his separation from service. Mr. Lowery is currently considered a “key employee” for this purpose.
28
2001 and 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plans
The Corporation entered into award agreements with Messrs. Smith, Norman L. Lowery, Carty, WhiteMcHargue, Clary and ClaryNorman D. Lowery under the 2001 and 2005 Plans.LTIPs. They are entitled to the following benefits upon a “change in control” (as defined below):
Mr. Smith: In addition to the benefits otherwise payable, if Mr. Smith is terminated within 12 months following a change in control, for reasons other than “cause” (as defined below), disability or death, he will be paid the vested account balance under the 2001 and 2005 Plans.LTIPs. Any payments from the Corporation or the Bank which are determined to be payments subject to the “golden parachute” rules of the Code, the amount due will be increased to include payment equal to the amount of excise tax imposed under Code Sections 280G and 4999 (the “Excise Tax Payment”) and the amount necessary to provide the Excise Tax Payment net of all income, payroll and excise taxes. The applicable amount will be paid in one single sum, for the 2001 and 2005 Plan,LTIPs, within 180 days following termination of employment.
Mr. Norman L. Lowery:In addition to the benefits otherwise payable, if Mr. Lowery is terminated within 12 months following a change in control, for reasons other than cause, disability or death, he will be paid the vested account balance under the 2001 and 2005 Plans.LTIPs. Any payments from the Corporation or the Bank which are determined to be payments subject to the “golden parachute” rules of the Code, the amount due will be increased to include payment equal to the amount of excise tax imposed under Code Sections 280G and 4999 (the “Excise Tax Payment”) and the amount necessary to provide the Excise Tax Payment net of all income, payroll and excise taxes. The applicable amount will be paid in one single sum, for the 2001 and 2005 Plans, within 180 days following termination of employment.
Messrs. Carty, WhiteMcHargue, Norman D. Lowery, and Clary: In addition to the benefits otherwise payable, if Messrs. Carty, WhiteMcHargue, Norman D. Lowery, or Clary areis terminated within 12 months following a change in control, for reasons other than cause, disability or death, they will be paid the vested account balance under the 2001 and 2005 PlansLTIPs as of the December 31 of the year preceding the year of termination under both Plans.
LTIPs.For purposes of the 2001 and 2005 Plans,LTIPs, “cause” is defined as: (i) an intentional act of fraud, embezzlement, theft or personal dishonesty, willful misconduct or breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit by the participant in the course of his employment or director service. No act or failure to act shall be deemed to have been intentional or willful if it was due primarily to an error in judgment or negligence. An act or failure to act shall be considered intentional or willful if it is not in good faith and if it is without a reasonable belief that the action or failure to act is in the best interest of the Corporation or its subsidiaries; (ii) intentional wrongful damage by the participant to the business or property of the Corporation or its subsidiaries, causing material harm to the Corporation or its subsidiaries; (iii) breach by the participant of any confidentiality or non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreement in effect from time to time with the Corporation or its subsidiaries; (iv) gross negligence or insubordination by the participant in the performance of his or her duties; or (v) removal or permanent prohibition of the participant from participating in the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, by an order issued under Section 8(e)(4) or 8(g)(1) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 USC 1818(e)(4) and (g)(1).
For purposes of the 2001 and 2005 Plans,LTIPs, “change in control” is defined as:
(i)Merger. The Corporation merges into or consolidates with another corporation or business entity, or merges another corporation or business entity into the Corporation, and as a result less than 50% of the combined voting power of the resulting corporation or business entity immediately after the merger or consolidation is held by persons who were the holders of the Corporation’s voting securities immediately before the merger or consolidation;
(ii)Acquisition of Significant Share Ownership. A report on Schedule 13D, or a successor form or schedule is filed or is required to be filed under Sections 13(d) or 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, if the report discloses that the filing person or persons acting in concert has or have become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of a class of the Corporation’s voting securities after the effective date of the 2001 or 2005 Plan,LTIP, but this provision shall not apply to beneficial ownership of voting shares of the Corporation held in a fiduciary capacity by a subsidiary of the Corporation or to beneficial ownership of voting shares of the Corporation held by the ESOP;
29
(iii)Change in Board Composition.During any period of two consecutive years, individuals who constitute the Board at the beginning of the two year period cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof. However, each director who, by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors who were directors at the beginning of the period, is first (a) nominated by the Board for election by stockholders,shareholders, or (b) elected to fill a vacancy on the Board, shall be deemed to have been a director at the beginning of the two-year period.
(iv)Sale of Assets. The Corporation (a) transfers substantially all of its assets to another corporation or business entity which is not a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation, or (b) sells substantially all of the assets of a subsidiary or affiliate which constitutes 20% or more of the assets of the Corporation and is a subsidiary or affiliate as of the effective date of the 2001 or 2005 Plan.
LTIP.2010 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
Messrs. Smith, Norman L. Lowery, McHargue, Clary and Norman D. Lowery received long-term incentive performance cash awards under the 2010 LTIP. In the event of a “change in control” (the same definition used for Mr. Norman L. Lowery’s employment agreement above), they will be 100 percent vested in their award which will be paid within 30 days of the date of the change in control. In the event a participant dies or incurs a termination due to disability, retirement, a termination by the participant for “good reason” or is terminated by the Corporation or the Bank without “cause” (the same definition as provided in the 2001 and 2005 LTIPs), he will become vested in his award and will receive payment within 30 days of the termination for purposes of the 2010 LTIP. “Good reason” means the occurrence of any of the following events which hasn’t been consented to in writing: (i) the requirement that the Participant move his personal residence, (ii) a reduction of ten percent or more of the participant’s salary unless part of an institution-wide reduction and similar to the reduction of all other similarly situated officers, (iii) the removal of the participant from participation in any incentive compensation plans or bonuses unless the company terminates participation in the plan or plans with respect to other similarly-situated officers; (iv) the assignment of duties and responsibilities materially different from those normally associated with his position; or (v) a material diminution or reduction in responsibilities or authority in connection with his employment.
The following table sets forth the severance and change in control benefits for each named executive officer under the specifically described scenarios as if such change in control and termination occurred as of December 31, 2009.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Termination by | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Corporation | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Without Cause, | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | by Executive for | | | Termination | | | Amounts | |
| | | | | | | | | Good Reason or | | | Within 12 | | | Payable Under | |
| | | | | | | | | Within 12 Months | | | Months After | | | Internal Revenue | |
| | | | | Termination | | | After Change | | | Change in | | | Code Section | |
| | | | | due to | | | in Control | | | Control | | | 280G Gross Up | |
| | | | | Retirement | | | (Employment | | | (2005 Plan) | | | Provisions | |
| Name | | Plan Name | | ($) | | | Agreement)($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | |
| (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | | | (f) | |
| Donald E. Smith | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 3,791,800 | (4) | | | — | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 3,167,200 | (4) | | | — | |
| | | Employment Agreement | | $ | 225,338 | (1)(2) | | $ | 4,677,580 | (1)(3) | | | — | | | $ | 2,163,136 | |
| Michael A. Carty | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 761,800 | (4) | | | — | |
| Richard O. White | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 731,690 | (4) | | | — | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | 2005 LTIP | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 545,372 | (4) | | | — | |
| Name | | Plan Name | | Termination of Employment (Executive Deferred Compensation, 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation, Executive Supplemental Retirement, 2005 Executive Supplemental Retirement, 2001 LTIP, 2005 LTIP) ($) | | | Termination Due to Retirement ($) | | | Termination by Corporation Without Cause, by Executive for Good Reason or Within 12 Months After Change in Control ( Employment Agreement) ($) | |
| Donald E. Smith | | 2001 LTIP | | | 1,270,479 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2005 LTIP | | | 2,043,639 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2010 LTIP | | | 138,207 | (4) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | 2001 LTIP | | | 1,256,555 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2005 LTIP | | | 2,007,150 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2010 LTIP | | | 113,268 | (4) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | EDC | | | 381,590 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2005 EDC | | | 248,174 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | Employment Agreement | | | — | | | | 354,292 | (1)(2) | | | 3,219,234 | (3) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | 2005 LTIP | | | 219,887 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2010 LTIP | | | 21,374 | (4) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Thomas S. Clary | | 2001 LTIP | | | 177,067 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2005 LTIP | | | 428,558 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2010 LTIP | | | 23,231 | (4) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | 2001 LTIP | | | 142,149 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2005 LTIP | | | 219,887 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 2010 LTIP | | | 21,724 | (4) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | |
| (1) | | Calculation of the health insurance amounts were based on the assumptions used for financial reporting purposes under generally accepted accounting principles assuming (i) termination occurred on December 31, 2009;2012; (ii) termination was as a result of retirement or change in control; and (iii) a 6.0%4.05% discount rate. Calculation of the life insurance amounts were based on the cost of buying a fully paid policy as of December 31, 2009.2012. |
|
| (2) | | This amount consists of (i) $88,863$229,500 for health, life and disability coverage; and (ii) $112,000$124,792 for the $350,000 life insurance policy; and (iii) $4,895 for the executive officer life insurance policy. |
|
| (3) | | This amount consists of (i) $2,600,296$1,860,891 for base salary and bonuses; (ii) $88,863$229,500 for health, life and disability coverage; (iii) $112,000$124,792 for the $350,000 life insurance policy; (iv) $4,895 for the executive officer life insurance policy; (v) $21,932$13,413 for professional and club dues; (vi) $840(v) $1,554 for continuing legal education; (vii) $49,000(vi) $9,132 for automobile benefits; (viii) $547,428(vii) $485,082 for his Pension Plan benefit; (ix) $47,164(viii) $39,609 for his ESOP benefit; (x) $906,632(ix) $219,381 for his ESRP benefit; (xi) $108,996 EDC Plan benefit; and (xii) $169,954(x) $235,880 representing the payment of items (ii)-(vii)(vi) net of all income and payroll taxes, as discussed beginning on page 13.taxes. |
|
| (4) | | All participants in the plans are entitled to receive their respective vested benefits upon the occurrence of any change of control as listed on page 15.defined in the plan. |
30
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
As of March 4, 2013, there were 13,307,498 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.The following table shows, as of March 17, 2010,4, 2013, the number and percentage of shares ofour common stock held by each person or entity known to the Corporationus to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of the issued and outstanding common stock, by the executive officers named in the beneficial ownership table below and our directors, and by our executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise specified, the address of each person listed is: One First Financial Plaza, P.O. Box 540, Terre Haute, IN 47808, and each person has sole voting and investment control of the Corporation:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Number | | | | |
| | | Of Shares | | | Percent of | |
| | | Beneficially | | | Shares | |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Owned | | | Outstanding | |
| | | | | | | | | |
First Financial Corporation
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
One First Financial Plaza
Terre Haute, Indiana 47807 | | | 827,661 | (1) | | | 6.30 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
PNC Financial Services Group Inc.
One PNC Plaza
249 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222 | | | 1,193,763 | | | | 9.09 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Princeton Mining Company
State Road 46 South
Terre Haute, Indiana 47803 | | | 1,310,074 | | | | 9.98 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
Palisades West, Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746 | | | 726,222 | | | | 5.53 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Blackrock, Inc.
40 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10022 | | | 687,145 | | | | 5.23 | % |
Five Percent Shareholders,
Directors, Nominee and
Certain Executive Officers | | Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership | | | Percent of
Outstanding Shares | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1)W. Curtis Brighton | | Represents shares held in trust by the Corporation’s subsidiary, First Financial Bank, N.A. |
31
The following table shows as of March 17, 2010 the number of our common shares beneficially owned (unless otherwise indicated) by the Corporation’s nominees for election as directors, the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, and the directors and executive officers of the Corporation as a group.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Aggregate Number | | | Percent of | |
| | | Of Shares Beneficially | | | Shares | |
| Name (Age) | | Owned(1) | | | Outstanding(2) | |
| W. Curtis Brighton (56) | | | 13,200 | | | | * | |
| Michael A. Carty (58) | | | 16,838 | (3) | | | * | |
| Thomas S. Clary (58) | | | 1,467 | (4) | | | * | |
| B. Guille Cox, Jr. (64) | | | 81,098 | (5) | | | * | |
| Thomas T. Dinkel (59) | | | 13,396 | | | | * | |
| Anton H. George (50) | | | 618 | | | | * | |
| Gregory L. Gibson (47) | | | 76,962 | | | | * | |
| William R. Krieble (62) | | | 375 | | | | | |
| Norman L. Lowery (63) | | | 20,616 | (6) | | | * | |
| Ronald K. Rich (71) | | | 2,050 | | | | * | |
| Virginia L. Smith (61) | | | 12,423 | | | | * | |
| Donald E. Smith (83) | | | 181,007 | (7) | | | 1.38 | % |
| William J. Voges(55) | | | 266,449 | | | | 2.03 | % |
| Richard O. White (62) | | | 23,387 | (8) | | | * | |
| All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons) | | | 709,886 | | | | 5.41 | % |
| 13,500 | | | |
| * | | Represents less than 1% of the Corporation’s outstanding common shares. |
| Thomas S. Clary | | | 2,431 (1)(12) | | | | * | |
(1)B. Guille Cox | | The information contained in this column is based upon stockholder records of the Corporation and information furnished to the Corporation by the individuals identified above. Unless otherwise indicated, each individual has sole voting and investment power of the shares indicated. |
| 79,349 (2) | | | | * | |
(2)Thomas T. Dinkel | | Based on the number of shares outstanding at March 17, 2010. |
| 14,901 | | | | * | |
(3)Anton H. George | | Includes 16,700 shares held for Mr. Carty’s account in the | 2,668 | | | | * | |
| Gregory L. Gibson | | | 87,752 | | | | * | |
| William R. Krieble | | | 3,230 | | | | * | |
| Norman D. Lowery | | | 27,302 (3)(12) | | | | * | |
| Norman L. Lowery | | | 49,687 (4)(12) | | | | * | |
| Rodger A. McHargue | | | 7,974 (5)(12) | | | | * | |
| Ronald K. Rich | | | 2,050 | | | | * | |
| Virginia L. Smith | | | 1,471 | | | | * | |
| Donald E. Smith | | | 208,397 (6)(12) | | | | 1.57 | % |
| William J. Voges | | | 268,313 (7) | | | | 2.02 | % |
| Princeton Mining Company | | | 1,310,074 (8) | | | | 9.84 | % |
First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan. |
|
(4)Plan | | | 898,607 (9) | | | | 6.75 | % |
| Blackrock, Inc. | | | 682,093 (10) | | | | 5.13 | % |
| Dimensional Fund Advisors LP | | | 679,116 (11) | | | | 5.10 | % |
| All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (14 persons) | | | 772,734 (12) | | | | 5.78 | % |
| (1) | Includes 1,467 shares1 share held for Mr. Clary’s account in the First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan.ESOP. |
|
(5) | (2) | Mr. Cox, under certain circumstances, has the power, with the consent of others, to vote an additional 117,968 shares (0.90%(.89%). These shares are not reflected in the number of shares or percent of class attributed to him in the above table. |
|
(6) | (3) | Includes 4,9344,248 shares held for Mr. Norman D. Lowery’s account in the First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan.ESOP. |
|
(7) | (4) | Includes 175,5856,525 shares held for Mr. Norman L. Lowery’s account in the ESOP. |
| (5) | Includes 2,680 shares held for Mr. McHargue’s account in the ESOP. |
| (6) | Includes 185,390 shares held for Mr. Smith’s account in the First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan.ESOP. |
| (7) | Includes 254,202 shares held in trust. Mr. Voges, as Trustee, has the power to vote these shares. |
| (8) | Based solely on information provided by Princeton Mining Company, Inc. in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2013. The Company has been advised that the shares held by Princeton Mining Company are voted by the President of Princeton Mining Company, Virginia L. Smith, at the direction of its Board of Directors. The Board of Directors of Princeton Mining Company is comprised of 7 individuals, including the following directors of the Corporation: Donald E. Smith (the Chairman of the Board and the President of the Corporation); Virginia L. Smith; Anton H. George; and, W. Curtis Brighton. In addition, Sarah J. Lowery, the daughter of Mr. Smith and the wife of Norman L. Lowery (the Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation) is a director of Princeton Mining Company. The address of Princeton Mining Company is State Road 46 South, Terre Haute, IN 47803. |
| (9) | Unless the terms of the ESOP or the fiduciary duties of the ESOP trustee require otherwise, the trustee will vote the ESOP shares as instructed by the participant. If the participant does not return the voting instruction card in a timely manner or if the voting instruction card is returned unsigned or without indicating how to vote the shares allocated to the ESOP account, the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee will direct the ESOP trustee to vote the shares allocated in the same proportion and in the same manner as the shares with respect to which timely and proper instructions by participants were received. The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee consists of Anton H. George, Ronald K. Rich, and William J. Voges. The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors and may be changed by the Board at any time. |
| (10) | Based solely on information provided by Blackrock, Inc. in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2013. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that the reporting person has sole power to vote and/or dispose of all shares beneficially owned and that the reporting person expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities. The address of Blackrock, Inc. is 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022. |
| (11) | Based solely on information provided by Dimensional Fund Advisors, LP in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2013. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that the reporting person has sole power to vote and/or dispose of all shares beneficially owned and that the reporting person expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities. The address of Dimensional Fund Advisors, LP is Palisades West Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746. |
| (12) | Includes 23,38750,595 shares held forof restricted common stock of the Corporation issued to our named executive officers as award opportunities under our Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan as follows: Mr. White’s accountSmith, 16,498 shares; Mr. Norman L. Lowery, 24,650 shares; Mr. McHargue, 4,774 shares; and Mr. Norman D. Lowery, 4,673 shares. These shares are restricted in the First Financial Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan.accordance with our Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan and a restricted stock award agreement with each named executive officer, and will vest in one-third increments over a three-year period commencing on December 31, 2013, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015, respectively. |
32
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Corporation’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Corporation’s equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Corporation common stock and other equity securities of the Corporation. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Corporation with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the best knowledge of the Corporation, during the most recent fiscal year all officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners of the Corporation timely filed all statements of beneficial ownership required to be filed with the SEC in 2012, with the exception of the following: William R. Krieble, who is one of our directors, filed a late Form 4 relating to two transactions for the aggregate purchase of 1,850 shares of Corporation common stock in 2012; and Virginia L. Smith, who is one of our directors, filed a late Form 4 relating to a transaction for the sale of 10,852 shares of Corporation common stock in 2012. In making this disclosure, we have relied solely upon written representations of our directors and executive officers and copies of reports that those persons have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and provided to us.
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF CROWE HORWATH AND COMPANY LLP AS THE CORPORATION’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TheAt its March 5, 2013 meeting, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors appointed Crowe Horwath and Company LLP (“Crowe Horwath”) as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the books, records and accounts of the Corporation for 2009 and 2008. At its March 2, 2010 meeting, the Audit Committee recommended and approved the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Corporation’s independent public accounting firm to audit the books, records and accounts of the Corporation for 2010.2013. The Corporation is seeking ratification of such action. Crowe Horwath LLP has been our independent registered public accounting firm since fiscal year 1999. Representatives of Crowe Horwath LLP are expected to be in attendance at the annual meeting and will be provided an opportunity to make a statement should they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate inquiries from the shareholders.
ReportIf shareholders do not ratify the selection ofCrowe Horwath LLPas our independent public accounting firm, or if prior to the 2013 annual meeting of shareholdersCrowe Horwath LLPceases to act as our independent public accounting firm, then the Audit Committee
In accordance with its written charter adopted by will reconsider the Boardselection of Directors, the Audit Committee of the Board (“Committee”) assisted the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of the quality and integrity of thean independent public accounting auditing and financial reporting practices of the Corporation. All of the members of the Committee are independent, as defined in the Corporation’s listing requirements, from management and the Corporation. During the current year, the Committee met four times, and the Committee chair, as representative of the Committee, discussed the interim financial information contained in each quarterly earnings announcement with the CFO, Controller and Independent Auditors prior to public release.
In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, the Committee obtained from the independent auditors a formal written statement describing all relationships between the auditors and the Corporation that might bear on the auditors’ independence consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” discussed with the auditors any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the auditors’ independence. The Committee also discussed with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of the Corporation’s internal controls and the internal audit functions organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. The Committee reviewed both with the independent and internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.
The Committee discussed and reviewed with the independent auditors all communications required by generally accepted auditing standards, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of the independent auditors’ examination of the financial statements. The Committee also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations.
The Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, with management and the independent auditors. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of the Corporation’s financial statements and the independent auditors have the responsibility for the examination of those statements.
Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management and the independent auditors, the Committee recommended to the Board that the Corporation’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Anton H. George, Audit Committee Chairman, Thomas T. Dinkel, Ronald K. Rich
firm.
33
MATTERS RELATING TO INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Fees Paid to Crowe Horwath and Company LLP
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by Crowe Horwath for audit services rendered in connection with the consolidated financial statements and reports for fiscal year 20092012 and fiscal year 20082011 and for other services rendered during fiscal year 20092012 and fiscal year 20082011 on behalf of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, as well as all out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with these services, which have been billed to the Corporation:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| Audit Fees | | $ | 292,000 | | | $ | 285,000 | |
| Audit Related Fees | | | 27,600 | | | | 4,500 | |
| Tax Fees | | | 62,280 | | | | 62,780 | |
| All Other Fees | | | 4,500 | | | | 4,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 386,380 | | | $ | 356,280 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| Audit Fees | | | 328,500 | | | | 311,500 | |
| Audit Related Fees | | | 33,750 | | | | 3,675 | |
| Tax Fees | | | 44,650 | | | | 44,650 | |
| All Other Fees | | | 5,300 | | | | 5,300 | |
| Total | | | 412,200 | | | | 365,125 | |
Audit Fees.FeesConsists of fees billed for professional services rendered for (i) the audit of the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements, (ii) the integrated audit over internal controls as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (iii) the review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, (iv) the services that are normally provided by Crowe Horwath in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, and (v) attestattestation services, except those not required by statute or regulation.
Audit-Related Fees.FeesConsists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include accounting consultations and performance of attestation services for student loan servicing for 2008.
Tax Fees.FeesConsists of tax compliance/preparation and other tax services. Tax compliance/preparation consists of fees billed for professional services related to federal and state tax compliance, and assistance with tax audits and appeals. Other tax services consist of fees billed for other miscellaneous tax consulting and planning.
All Other Fees.FeesAll other fees include Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 and internal audit software licensing fees in both years.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors
All of the fees and services described above under “audit fees,” “audit-related fees,” “tax fees” and “all other fees” were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of services provided by the independent auditors. Under the policy, pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is subject to a specific budget. In addition, the Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. For each proposed service, the independent auditor is required to provide detailed back-up documentation at the time of approval. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. Such a member must report any decisions to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting.
34
PROPOSAL 3: NON-BINDINGAdvisory Vote TO APPROVE THE Compensation Paid to Named Executive OfficersSECTION 16 BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a)The core of
our compensation philosophy is our attempt to closely align the
Securitiesinterests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders. Our executive compensation programs seek to: | · | attract and retain talented executives who are critical to our success |
| · | be competitive with the market |
| · | align the interests of shareholders and executives over both the short and long-term time horizons |
| · | avoid the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. |
The compensation committee and Exchange Actthe board of 1934 requiresdirectors believe that our executive compensation is a good reflection of our compensation philosophy and is well aligned with our corporate performance. We urge shareholders to read the Corporation’s directorsCompensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement for a detailed discussion of our executive compensation programs and how they reflect our philosophy and are linked to corporate performance.
We recognize that executive compensation is important to our shareholders, and we value their opinions on our compensation philosophy and programs. We are asking our shareholders to vote on an advisory basis to approve the compensation of our named executive officer as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Corporation’s equity securities, to file with the Securitiesphilosophy, policies and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) initial reports of ownershippractices described in this proxy statement.
The vote on this proposal is advisory, and reports of changes in ownership of Corporation common stock and other equity securities of the Corporation. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnishtherefore not binding on the Corporation, with copiesthe Compensation Committee or our Board of all Section 16(a) forms they file.Directors. To the best knowledge ofextent there is any significant vote against the Corporation, duringexecutive officer compensation proposal, however, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and the most recent fiscal year all officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners ofcompensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE“FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
In addition to the Corporation timely filed all statements of beneficial ownership requiredadvance notice requirements under our by-laws described below, a shareholder who desires to be filed with the SEC, with the exception of Mr. Cox, who filed one late Form 4include a proposal in our proxy soliciting materials relating to a gift in 2008 of 894 shares of common stock of the Corporation. In making this disclosure, we have relied solely upon written representations of our directors and executive officers and copies of reports that those persons have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and provided to us.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Under our bylaws, no business may be brought before an2014 annual meeting
unlessof shareholders must send the proposal in
one of the following ways: (i)writing to Mr. Rodger A. McHargue, our Secretary, such that we receive it
is specifiedat our principal executive office at One First Financial Plaza, Terre Haute, Indiana 47808 no later than November 19, 2013. Any such proposal must be made in
the notice of the meeting (which includes shareholder proposals that the Corporation is required to include in its proxy statement pursuant toaccordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934); (ii) such1934.Shareholders desiring to make a director nomination or a proposal for any business is otherwise brought before theor matter to be presented at any annual meeting by or at the directionof shareholders of the Corporation must comply with the advance notice procedures provided in our by-laws. Those procedures are summarized below. A complete copy of our by-laws was included as an exhibit to the Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on August 24, 2012 and is available on the Internet website of the Securities and Exchange Commission atwww.sec.gov.
Nominations for the election as directors and proposals for any business or matter to be presented at any annual meeting of shareholders may be made by any of our shareholders of record entitled to vote in the election of directors or on the business or matter to be presented, as the case may be, or by our Board of Directors; or (iii) such business is brought before the meeting byDirectors. In order for a shareholder who has deliveredto make such a nomination or proposal, the Corporation’s Secretary must receive notice to the Corporation (containing certain information specifiedthereof in our bylaws)writing not less than 120 days prior to the meeting, or December 22, 2009 for purposesdate of the 2010 Annual Meeting. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the SEC’s requirementsannual meeting; provided, however, that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in the Corporation’s proxy statement. All proposals and notifications should be addressed to the Secretaryevent that less than 130 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the Corporation.
Any proposals whichdate of the annual meeting is given or made to shareholders
desire(which notice or public disclosure shall include the date of the annual meeting specified in our by-laws, if the annual meeting is held on such date), notice by the shareholder to
present at the 2011 Annual Meetingbe timely must be received by
us no later than the close of the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. No notice of any kind under this procedure is required for any nominations for the election as directors or any proposals for any business or matter made by or at the direction of our Board of Directors.Each notice given by a shareholder with respect to a nomination for election as a director must set forth for each nominee: (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are beneficially owned by such person, and (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for the election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including without limitation such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected). The shareholder making the nomination must provide his or her name, record address and the class and number of our stock beneficially owned by the shareholder and must promptly provide any other information relating to his or her nominee as may be reasonably requested by us.
Each notice given by a shareholder with respect to proposals for any business or other matter to be presented at its principal executive officesany meeting of shareholders must set forth as to each matter: (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the name and record address of the shareholders proposing such business, (iii) the class and number of shares of our stock beneficially owned by the shareholder, and (iv) any material interest of the shareholder in such business. The shareholder making a proposal also must promptly provide any other information relating to his or her proposal as may be reasonably requested by us.
If any nomination or proposal is not made in accordance with the requirements of this notice procedure, the chairman of the annual meeting of shareholders at which such nomination or proposal is sought to be presented may determine that the nomination or proposal was not made in accordance with the notice procedure and, in such event, he may declare to the meeting that the defective nomination or proposal is out of order and will be disregarded and not presented for a vote of the shareholders. This notice procedure does not require the Corporation to hold any meeting of shareholders for the purpose of considering any nomination or proposal made by any shareholder.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE INTERNET AVAILABILITY
OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2013 ANNUAL MEETING
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s e-proxy rules require companies to post their proxy materials on the internet and permit them to provide only a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to shareholders. For this proxy statement, we have chosen to follow the SEC’s “full set” delivery option, and therefore, although we are posting a full set of our proxy materials (this proxy statement and our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012) online, we are also mailing a full set of our proxy materials to our shareholders. The Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Card and Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, are available at:
https://www.First-Online.com/proxy
We are mailing a full set of our printed proxy materials to shareholders of record on or before November 25, 2010about March 18, 2013. On this date, all shareholders of record and beneficial owners will have the ability to access all of the proxy materials on the website referred to above. These proxy materials will be available free of charge.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Upon written request, the Corporation will provide without charge to each requesting shareholder a copy of the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K, which is required to be considered for inclusion in the Corporation’s proxy material for that meeting. The proxy rules offiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission governfor the contentyear ended December 31, 2012. Address all requests to:
Rodger A. McHargue, Secretary and form of stockholder proposals and the minimum stock holding requirement. All proposals must be a proper subject for action at the 2011 Annual Meeting.
For additional information regarding the shareholder nomination process, please see “Communications with Independent Directors” on page 13.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
UPON WRITTEN REQUEST, THE CORPORATION WILL PROVIDE WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH REQUESTING SHAREHOLDER, A COPY OF THE CORPORATION’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009. ADDRESS ALL REQUESTS TO:
RODGER A. MCHARGUE, SECRETARY AND TREASURER
FIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
ONE FIRST FINANCIAL PLAZA
TreasurerFirst Financial Corporation
One First Financial Plaza
P.O. BOX 540
TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA
Terre Haute, Indiana 47808
35
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Corporation knows of no business that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting other than the items referred to above. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting for action by shareholders, proxies in the enclosed form returned to the Corporation will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the best judgment of the proxy holder.
| | | | |
| | By Order of the Board of Directors |
| | |
| | | | | |
| | /s/ Donald E. Smith | | |
| | | Donald E. Smith
Chairman of the Board and President | | |
March 25, 2010
36
FIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
One First Financial Plaza
P.O. Box 540
CorporationTerre Haute, Indiana 47808
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
For Use at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The undersigned hereby appoints James E. Brown and Richard J. Shagley, or eitherand each of them, as Proxies,proxies, each withhaving the power to act without the other and to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote as designated below, all shares of common stock of First Financial Corporation which(the “Corporation”) that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at One First Financial Plaza, Terre Haute, Indiana on Wednesday, April 21, 2010,17, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. (local time), orand at any adjournment or postponement thereof, onwith all of the following matters:
| o | | For all nominees listed below for a three-year term to expire in 2013
(except as marked to the contrary below): |
|
| | | W. Curtis Brighton, William R. Krieble, Ronald K. Rich and Donald E. Smith. |
|
| o | | WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed above. |
powers the undersigned would possess if personally present.The Board of Directors recommends you vote for the following:
1. Election of Directors.
¨FOR all nominees listed below for a three-year term to expire in 2016
(except as marked to the contrary below):
W. Curtis Brighton William R. Krieble Ronald K. Rich
¨ WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed above.
(INSTRUCTIONS:Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any individual, strike a line through the nominees’nominee’s name in the list above.)
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.
2. Ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2013.
¨ For¨ Against¨ Abstain
2. | | Ratification of the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP, as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2009. |
For o Against o Abstain o
| 3. | | In their discretion, on such matters as may properly come beforeApprove, by an advisory vote, the meeting.compensation paid to the Corporation’s named executive officers. |
¨ For¨ Against¨ Abstain
NOTE: Such Other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED This proxy will be voted as directed, but if no direction is given, this proxy will be votedFOR ALL THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE. all of the nominees listed in Proposal 1, andFOR Proposals 2 and 3. With respect to any other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the proxies named herein will have the authority to vote on such matters and intend to vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Corporation’s Board of Directors or, in the absence of such a recommendation is given, in accordance with their best judgment.
Please sign exactly as name appears below. If there are two or more owners, botheach must sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
| | | | | |
Dated:
| | | | |
| | Dated : | | | | |
| | | | (Signature) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | |
| | | (Signature, if held jointly) | | |
| | | | | |
| | | Your vote is important. Please mark, sign, and date and return this Proxy promptly, using the enclosed envelope. | | (Signature, if held jointly) | |
| | | | | |
Your vote is important. Please mark, sign, date and return this Proxy promptly, using the enclosed envelope.
